Misplaced Pages

Talk:Linda R. Reade

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Caseeart (talk | contribs) at 18:41, 8 April 2014 (→Rubashkin Case). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:41, 8 April 2014 by Caseeart (talk | contribs) (→Rubashkin Case)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited States courts and judges Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section on Rubashkin trial

This section is getting to be too prominent here. Anyone who wants to write about the Rubashkin trial is advised to work on Sholom Rubashkin. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Now under discussion here. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Shortened it and fixed BLP and style issues Lower458 (talk) 00:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Still fails BLP; see my response to your post on my talk page. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Can you please FIX instead of deleting? You seem to know the rules better Lower458 (talk) 00:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Question: Justice Reade's involvement in the Agriprocessors raid and the Rubashkin trial is something which was covered in many credible publications - This story is of great importance and interest to the Orthodox Jewish community, who claim that Mr. Rubashkin was treated unfairly and harshly by Justice Reade. I feel it belongs on her page. How would I structure an edit without violating BLP etc. Lower458 (talk) 14:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I think the key issue here would be to write a section on her rulings more generally, so that a discussion of Rubashkin did not falsely convey the impression that this is the only significant issue on which she has ever issued a ruling. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Will try that soon, thanks Lower458 (talk) 04:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that the Rubashkin case is a major (the major?) part of her WP:NOTABILITY. I propose restoring the 'Controversy' paragraph which seemed to include a few well-sourced lines from major press accounts dealing with the case. Winchester2313 (talk) 06:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Rubashkin Case

Judge Reade's Ruling on the Rubashkin case which was a nationally high profile case should get more "coverage" on her biography page. From beginning, the case startled the Jewish communities, attracted national headlines and eventually created documentaries on the US justice system.

There were three main points expressed in the sources about Judge Reade: 1-Judge Reade's undisclosed 10 month involvement with prosecuters prior to trial. (We may never find out what was really discussed).

2- Judge Reade's lengthy 27 year sentence which exceeded prosecutors 25 year request (for a first time non violent crime).

3- Judge Reade's initial denial of bail (in part) on the basis that Rubashkin is "Jewish" and thus he is a flight risk to Israel.

Numerous Jewish groups claimed "Rubashkin’s prosecution was a product of anti-Semitism seem knee-jerk and unfounded."

Until today many (or perhaps most) farms rely on illegal immigrants for their workforce. ]

I agree with previous users, and I think we should add additional to the article.Caseeart(talk) 08:11, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

There's no way this article is turning into a jeremiad against Reade. Perhaps it would make sense to write about the Postville case in context of writing about other cases she has decided. If that isn't possible or desirable, then perhaps another sentence about the Rubashkin case would work. But you can see in the history the kind of thing that's been tried (and rejected) in the past. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Obviously not to take over the article. However I think would be more than 1 line since this is not only about the Rubashkin case. We could focus on the responses her ruling received from high profile politicians and the and from active congress. To keep the article neutral - could include that 8th circuit Appeals held up the ruling.
Do you know of other cases she presided on that made it to the news?Caseeart (talk) 18:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Categories: