Misplaced Pages

User talk:Thomas Limberg (Schmogrow)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by YohanN7 (talk | contribs) at 00:50, 9 May 2014 (→Give Thomas Limberg one more chance). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:50, 9 May 2014 by YohanN7 (talk | contribs) (→Give Thomas Limberg one more chance)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Thomas Limberg (Schmogrow), you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Thomas Limberg (Schmogrow)! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:TPG

If you want to participate at Talk:Naive set theory#Proposed move you are welcome to do so, but please keep your comments on topic. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Mathematics. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kinu /c 19:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Thomas, you are allowed to edit here on the assumption you are working in good faith and that you sincerely intend to improve Misplaced Pages articles. I hope you are not just wasting our time. More outbursts like this one, "I hereby define, Paul Halmos' book is crap! " may lead to you being blocked for disruptive editing. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
You're very unscientific here, citing totally out of context! If you had read the whole post of mine, you would've understood that it was a pure defense action! Thomas Limberg (Schmogrow) (talk) 23:14, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Give Thomas Limberg one more chance

Hi Thomas!

Cool down! Told you it was a bad idea to be generally rude. Now you have eyes on you.

There is no question that you can contribute constructively if you only change your minds setting a little bit. You aren't stupid, but you have to recognize that you aren't exactly in the company of droolers when you go into the foundations of mathematics here in Misplaced Pages. You did well in a math olympics (third), but I outperformed you. I actually came in second in a beauty contest!!! The contestans were actually me and my two ugly brothers, but I still beat you. YohanN7 (talk) 22:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

YohanN7, in my eyes I was not "generally rude"! And even if I was, that would not be a sufficient condition to block someone!!! Thomas Limberg (Schmogrow) (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Right, calling people stupid (like in the reference desk, Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Mathematics#1+2+3+4+5+... vs. 1+3+5+...) isn't being generally rude. It is being particularly rude, especially since you were utterly wrong when it came to the mathematics. I have seen people banned indefinitely for much less.

Stop for a while to see things from your point of view. It doesn't serve you well because you obviously have little good judgement at the moment.

I am not going to respond to any post of yours in the coming two weeks, partly because it makes me look bad (disruptive editors are supposed to be left, well, just unanswered, nod fed), and partly because it is too tiring.
Don't reply to this. YohanN7 (talk) 00:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)