Misplaced Pages

Academic elitism

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ssumlin (talk | contribs) at 00:22, 12 May 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:22, 12 May 2014 by Ssumlin (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Academic elitism is the criticism that academia or academics are prone to elitism. The term "ivory tower" often carries with it an implicit critique of academic elitism.

Description

Economist Thomas Sowell's Intellectuals and Society claims that intellectuals have an undeserved "halo effect" and are thus unfairly permitted to speak outside their expertise. In Sowell's estimation, academics respected for their contributions in their particular discipline often become known to the general public by commenting on policy issues outside that discipline.

Critics of academic elitism argue that highly educated people tend to form an isolated social group whose views tend to be over represented among journalists, professors, and other members of the intelligentsia who often draw their salary and funding from taxpayers. Economist Dan Klein shows that the worldwide top-35 economics departments pull 76 percent of their faculty from their own graduates. He argues that the academic culture is pyramidal, not polycentric, and resembles a closed and genteel social circle. Meanwhile, he claims, academia draws on resources from taxpayers, foundations, endowments, and tuition payers, and it judges the social service delivered. The result is a self-organizing and self-validating circle.

Another criticism is that universities tend more to pseudo-intellectualism than intellectualism per se; for example, academicians may be charged with over-complicating problems and expressing them in obscure language (e.g., the Sokal affair, obscurantism).

Academic elitism suggests that in highly competitive academic environments only those individuals who have engaged in scholarship are deemed to have anything worthwhile to say, or do. It suggests that individuals who have not engaged in such scholarship are cranks. Steven Zhang of the Cornell Daily Sun has described the graduates of elite schools, especially those in the Ivy League, as having a "smug sense of success" because "It makes us believe gaining entrance into the Ivy League is an accomplishment unto itself." Deeming scholarly academic discourse as the only means with which to engage in a topic has various implications in a variety of fields of study.

Feminist Academia

Feminist Theory is a recognized legitimate field of study in academia. Feminist academia provides the rhetoric and explanative power to build the knowledge of women’s oppression and the tools to challenge the apparent subordination. Feminist theory has a language of its own to describe the inequalities and place a name to the many concepts and ideas that comprise the feminist theories. The root goal of a multitude of feminist theories is to encourage the collective discourse of a variety of people from different walks of life (cite). In practice however, this perceived inclusion is not necessarily true.

Feminism can be seen as elitist by creating a unique language specific to feminism that is not accessible to all. The requirement of learning the complex lexicon of feminism can hinder women seeking to become involved in the movement but unable to attend college. Irony can be found in trying to legitimize the field of feminist theory and branch out inclusive theory such as intersectionality, Black Feminism, Indigenous feminism, and transnational feminism. The very rhetoric of the field may alienate women who are unable to attain a college education which in turn reduces these women's credibility in feminism.

See also

References

  1. Klein, Daniel B. (2005). "The Ph.D. Circle in Academic Economics". Econ Journal Watch. 2 (1): 133–148. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  2. http://cornellsun.com/node/46778

Further reading

  • Trow, Martin, "Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Education," Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1973 .
  • Papers about Academic elitism
Categories: