This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 112.79.37.83 (talk) at 12:13, 26 May 2014 (→Hey). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:13, 26 May 2014 by 112.79.37.83 (talk) (→Hey)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Done here
Arbitration enforcement block
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for my explanation at the bottom of this section to enforce the discretionary sanctions authorised in the India-Pakistan case, you have been blocked from editing for a period of two months. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.
Srich32977
Read, and stay off this talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey
DS, I hope you don't mind the little tweak. Well, maybe you do, but I'm only trying to help. I missed the tail end of the arbitration case and I'm sorry that this is how it ended. I hope you're not totally done here; you have performed some valuable service to Her Majesty, despite the other stuff. Take care, Drmies (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Drmies: No worries, the break was needed. I was definitely out of patience , will have to appeal the TBAN when I return, else the socks will have a field day. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks DS. Again, take care of yourself. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- I echo Drmies's comments, DS. I, too, did not follow the arbitration case, but I can easily say I'll miss you while you're gone. Have fun in your real life.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks DS. Again, take care of yourself. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
If there is some edits you want to suggest in the area covered by your topic ban feel free to email me (as long as they're not the kind that'd get me into trouble, I got enough of that). If they seem legit and constructive I'd be happy to make the changes. Sorry about the topic ban.Volunteer Marek (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Don`t be daft Darkness Shines (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Although, a revert here would be appreciated, have it up for GA, would like it to get there. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Volunteer Marek or anyone else, what topic ban? I see a discussion of a possible topic ban at AE, but I don't see that one was imposed. There's also nothing listed at WP:Editing restrictions. Am I missing something? As for making edits on behalf of DS, I'd tread carefully in that regard, as you might find yourself accused of editing by proxy on behalf of a blocked user.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- TBAN logged at here Feel free to support my appeal Darkness Shines (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, DS.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wow. Shooting you would have been kinder. --regentspark (comment) 23:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ping me (us) when you file that appeal. I like to think that an appeal (with maybe a voluntary restriction or two? maybe 1R or something like that?) could be successful. Drmies (talk) 19:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wow. Shooting you would have been kinder. --regentspark (comment) 23:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, DS.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- TBAN logged at here Feel free to support my appeal Darkness Shines (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear Darkness Shines, past few months I was very irregular in wikipedia. That is why I didn't follow the whole story. Few days ago I saw in my watch list that your account was banned! It is very bad feeling for me indeed. I wish after removal of ban period you will be available again in wikipedia. Actually wikipedia needs experienced people like you. Take this period as leave.--FreemesM 09:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Darkness Shines should be topic banned permanently from India pakistan related contents.However he must be allowed to edit other pages not related to India Pakistan
A beer for you!
I feel sorry that you had been blocked. Misplaced Pages will miss an editor who used to take care of vandals and protect its article like a warrior guarding his fort. I hope you remember this conversation of ours. Relax and chill down with this beer. Vatsan34 (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC) |
Some baklava for you!
I could always look forward to you before the ban. Don't lose your heart. Aditya 03:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC) |