This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Matty.007 (talk | contribs) at 15:05, 26 May 2014 (Class). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:05, 26 May 2014 by Matty.007 (talk | contribs) (Class)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Boat Race 2000 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 9, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of The Boat Race 2003 was copied or moved into The Boat Race 2000 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Boat Race 2000 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Race 2000/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments
- You need to fix the lead to encompass the fact that it's now the joint-tallest and was the youngest per some "modern" concept.
- Should "TA Stallard" be "T.A. Stallard" per the other names?
- "based on the opinion that getting a lead early in the race would give them an advantage" no reference for this opinion.
- "Cambridge pressed and rewon their lead, and were a quarter of a length ahead after a favourable bend. Though level at Chiswick Steps, Oxford pushed ahead, gaining a five second lead by Barnes Bridge, and eight at the finish." no reference.
- "18 minutes, 4 seconds to Cambridge's 18 minutes and 12 seconds." would be cleaner to say "eight seconds ahead of Cambridge."
- Reaction section is incredibly light considering this race was a "shock triumph" for Oxford.
More soon. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Attepted fix of all. Thanks, Matty.007 19:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Few more
- "The result was a "shock triumph", and Oxford lost in 2001" confused by the relevance of the latter portion of this sentence.
- "joint tallest" I would imagine should be hyphenated, always worth checking with someone who knows what they're talking about mind you...
- "1999 race by three-and-a-half lengths," probably a full stop needed here.
- "Oxford were considered the underdogs, and their victory came as a "shock triumph"." this is in the crew section, you've given the game away before the race description section!
- Have you checked that no other crew members have Misplaced Pages articles?
- "that getting a lead" getting -> taking
- "8 seconds later" later -> behind.
- "ever modern winner" still uncertain what the definition of "modern" is here.
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The Rambling Man: attempted fix of all. Thanks, Matty.007 18:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Nearly there, just one query, please make sure your "works" and "publishers" are consistently and correctly formatted. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Attempted fix. Thanks, Matty.007 17:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Any reason why "The Independent Rowing News" is a publisher while "BBC Sport" is a work? What's your logic? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- ProveIt GT only has the publisher slot for magazines, but I have now changed it. Thanks, Matty.007 18:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Any reason why "The Independent Rowing News" is a publisher while "BBC Sport" is a work? What's your logic? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Why is one person cited inline? "Glassman 22"? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Referencing the table. Unless it should go elsewhere? Thanks, Matty.007 18:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- I usually introduce the table with some prose, or worst case add a "Source:" style attribution below the table. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Moved. In a better place now, or should it be somewhere else? Thanks, Matty.007 18:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. One last check over before I promote. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Moved. In a better place now, or should it be somewhere else? Thanks, Matty.007 18:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- I usually introduce the table with some prose, or worst case add a "Source:" style attribution below the table. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class rowing articles
- GA-Class University of Cambridge articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford articles
- Unknown-importance University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class University of Oxford (colleges) articles
- WikiProject University of Oxford articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Unknown-importance London-related articles