Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Duplicate content
I just wanted to place a note here stating that I removed a section of content that was pretty much identical in sources and content to the Career section of the Mike Zammuto page. Of course, we could removed that information from the Zammuto page and place it here instead, so I'm open to discussing it here if that is the consensus view. GenuineDiva (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
If the information is applicable to the company, then what is in another article would not be relevant here. Also, please refrain from trying to paint a picture different than the sourcing. Staying that "Brand.com charges clients........." Is not what the source says. --BeloyiseBurron (talk) 21:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
See the recent reversion from one of the top editors on the site for your last edit. The mere fact you've appeared out of nowhere to suddenly defend a paid-editing company makes me ... but hey, WP:AGF right - I'm very certain you merely interested in the well-being of this public relations agency without any connection to it. Great to see it; almost never, ever happens. Ain't gonna edit-war, but definitely won't allow the white-washing of a company page when it has linked its revenues to this amazing, free, not-for-profit project. Especially those without the wherewithal to respond in a less obvious way. GenuineDiva (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
I was thinking the same about you coming in as a new editor , manipulating references and trying to use Misplaced Pages as your medium to try to destroy a company. The fact that you ate being paid to destroy the page makes me wonder. No edit sar is necessary. ArbComm will receive the information shortly. --BeloyiseBurron (talk) 22:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
