Talk:Quantum of Solace - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SchroCat (talk | contribs) at 10:45, 16 June 2014 (→Review description: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 10:45, 16 June 2014 by SchroCat (talk | contribs) (→Review description: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quantum of Solace article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Quantum of Solace has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Quantum of Solace is part of the James Bond films series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 28, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
January 23, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Agent Strawberry Fields was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 September 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Quantum of Solace. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: British / German / Italian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

James Bond (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject James Bond, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.James BondWikipedia:WikiProject James BondTemplate:WikiProject James BondJames Bond

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Template:Find sources notice

007 in New York connection

The article is missing the fact the final sequence of the film, wherein Bond warns an agent that her boyfriend is the enemy, is taken from the short story "007 in New York" from the Octopussy and the Living Daylights omnibus. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Please find a reliable source that says that so we can cite it when adding that bit of info. DonQuixote (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I agree with you both: it is probably from 007 in NY, but without a reliable secondary source it remains original research. - SchroCat (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Review description

Theironminer, Could you please stop edit warring and discuss your proposed changes. Your suggested text goes against a long-standing consensus and you need to stop editing and explain WHY you think the change is a positive one. I have left you notification that one more reversion will breach WP:3RR, and I strongly advise you to read that policy before you edit that phrase again. - SchroCat (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Categories: