This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 117Avenue (talk | contribs) at 04:33, 17 July 2014 (→Nomination of [] for deletion: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:33, 17 July 2014 by 117Avenue (talk | contribs) (→Nomination of [] for deletion: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hi. --Rob (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Stefan Molyneux
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mike V • Talk 20:14, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- You're right, I'm sorry for getting frustrated and resorting to reverts. --Rob (talk) 02:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
FYI
Hello. I was disappointed to see the discussion of the Molyneux lede cut short with Netoholic/Srich's insertion of new text which doesn't fully address the issues. The reason I'm posting here is to inform you that I left a note on Srich's talk objecting to his insertion of Netoholic's language without prior consensus on talk, and that Srich cited a "thanks" ping from you in dismissing my concern. You might want to have a look on Srich32977's talk page to see what happened. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 19:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- I thanked him for making a sincere effort at compromise on a relatively minor issue. I think a lot of conflicts over smaller items (comparatively), have caused us to miss focus on much larger issues. --Rob (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please don't misunderstand, I'm not here to quarrel with your right to thank whom you please. On the other hand, given that Srich's edit was done to facilitate Netoholic's insertion of text after he self-reverted out of concern for an edit-war block -- and given that I do think we should get consensus on talk rather than risk yet another go-round on this topic -- I doubt that your "thanks" was intended to justify Srich's action in facilitating Netoholic's edit or short-circuiting talk consensus before the edit. It's entirely up to you whether you feel comfortable with Srich invoking your gracious gesture as justification for his action, but it struck me that it would be up to you to speak for yourself, not up to him to use you in that way. Anyway, that was my reason for the message here. SPECIFICO talk 20:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Eurovision Young Dancers 2007
Hi, I am sorry that I read your comment too late and my article has been deleted, I am disappointed because I thought that since it was in the official page it could be useful to have this information included on the website... is there a way I can recuperate at least the information I introduced? Is there a way the article can be valid? Thanks Lprincon (talk) 22:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, you can visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for undeletion and follow the directions there. --Rob (talk) 00:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Crystal Clarke
Nothing useful in the history, the previous deleted article was a childish autobio, not the same person. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for looking. --Rob (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Crystal Clarke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crystal Clarke is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Crystal Clarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Assassin! 01:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Giant in My Heart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giant in My Heart is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Giant in My Heart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 20:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Jean-Serge Brisson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Serge Brisson is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jean-Serge Brisson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 117Avenue (talk) 04:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)