Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Titoxd (talk | contribs) at 08:24, 3 July 2006 ({{Wr4}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Citation issues

Although this is a moot point since the debate section has been removed from the death penalty article, I noticed this edit of yours and I wish to call your attention to Court citation. The argument which I added in the debate section was sufficiently cited to the Supreme Court of California case which it came from. The Slaughter decision has been published online on LexisNexis and Westlaw as well as the California Reports, which are available for public access in all California county law libraries as well as many public libraries in California. LexisNexis also has an official California Opinions site (under contract with the California courts) for public access to California Reports. --Coolcaesar 17:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The reference did not support the sentence as far as I could tell. ER MD 18:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Stop

Stop removing information! --Striver 21:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

that paragraph was is duplicated in the next section. ER MD 22:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Also removed propaganda from youtube(a great source of information if I've ever heard on one)--not even a real discussion on shock and awe--simply a criticism of iraq war--propaganda needs to be removed. ER MD 00:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

It EXPLICITLY is talking about shock and awe, it is explicitly relevant to this article. I dont care if you label it propaganda, its the other sides arguements. --Striver 10:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Alrighty, I will insert some POV into the intro and let us see if you tolerate the "other side's arguments." ER MD 19:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Misplaced Pages pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. The edit I refer to is here. IrishGuy 04:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Misplaced Pages pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Also, please do not remove warnings from your talk page. That, too, goes against policy. IrishGuy 18:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Question

Hi. I have a couple of quick questions about one of the articles you're working on, if you have just a second. You can send me an email through Misplaced Pages: Special:Emailuser/Justen Thanks! Justen Deal 22:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Pilotguy 23:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings

Don't do it. Simple as that. 69.145.123.171 Monday, July 3, 2006, 08:11 (UTC)

3RR

Doesn't apply when one is dealing with vandalism. 69.145.123.171 Monday, July 3, 2006, 08:21 (UTC)

No, I'm not. And I've added you to the Administrator's Noticeboard for your behavior. --69.145.123.171 08:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Titoxd 08:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)