This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2over0 (talk | contribs) at 19:07, 16 August 2014 (Warning: Edit warring on Acupuncture. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:07, 16 August 2014 by 2over0 (talk | contribs) (Warning: Edit warring on Acupuncture. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please be more careful next time
Please don't mass delete medrs compliant sources. Your edit summary does not give a valid reason to delete text and sources you don't like. QuackGuru (talk) 03:34, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- You need consensus before adding it. Iceman hypothesis is not supported by evidence. -A1candidate (talk) 09:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- You were previously warned about misrepresenting a source.
- You have not shown on the talk page what is the problem with all my edits.
- You claim "The Ice Man hypothesis is not supported by any scientific evidence."
- Your comment on the talk page is not correct according to the reliable source. The source does not say that it is a hypothesis that is not supported by any scientific evidence.
- Your comment on the talk page suggests I added original research to the article but I did no such thing. I get the impression you did not read the full text and blindly reverted.
- This is what the source says: "Bizarrely, the ‘Ice Man’, who lived in the Alps about 5000 years ago, displays tattoo marks on his body which correspond to acupuncture points. To some experts, this suggests that an acupuncture-like therapy was already used in Europe 5 millennia ago ."
- Please strike your misleading comments on the talk page and revert your edit. QuackGuru (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Acupuncture. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC)