Misplaced Pages

USER MIKKALAI IS ACCUSED OF VANDALISM IN WIKIPEDIA. SELFISHNESS AND CLEARLY SELF SERVING TACTICS SEEM TO HAVE BECOME THE TRADEMARK OF MR. MIKKALAI, WHO CONTINUES CONTRADICTING HIMSELF, MOST POINTEDLY IN THE WIKIPEDIA'S KVEN ARENA. FOR INSTANCE, MR. MIKKALAI HAS CONTINUED BLOCKING INNOCENT USERS FROM EDITING THE WIKIPEDIA'S KVEN ARTICLE AND FROM FIGHTING OFF THOSE WHO PUSH FALSE INFORMATION TO WIKIPEDIA AND WHO DO NOT BACK UP THEIR INSERTS WITH ANY SOURCES. MR. MIKKALAI BLOCKS OFF THOSE WHO PLAY BY THE RULES, LEAVING IN PEACE THOSE WHO ACT UP AGAINST THE RULES.

WE ALL SHALL BECOME PAID BASED ON OUR DEEDS, INCLUDING MR. MIKKALAI, THE APPARENT SOLDIER OF EVIL. WHY NOT TRY ANOTHER FORUM, MR. MIKKALAI - OR ELSE, PLAY FAIR ? YOUR TACTICS ARE OTHERWISE GOING TO BE USED AGAINST YOURSELF !

On behalf of the entire Misplaced Pages Community - The Swedish Wikipedians worldwide - July 5, 2006

Passée Double

Thanks for your note. Yes, I saw that a very few uses were of a different sort of march (and indeed there is a film called May, among other things). But they don't have to be linked, and being unlinked is better than being linked to the wrong place. Still I am pleased to have achieved edits like this one. Rich Farmbrough 18:16 27 June 2006 (GMT).

Re. Japanese dates

Thank you for providing me with this valuable new information, dear Mikka - in fact, I was merely acting because this particular anonymous user had just been reported at WP:AIV as a recurrent vandal, and who had been blocked just yesterday because of the same editing pattern. Aparently, the lack of any explanation by this editor induced everyone to believe he was merely performing a massive removal of information, and that his activity was nothing but a vandalism spree. I recommend you to make this information available to all the involved parties and the blocking admins, and I leave up to you to instrument the unblocking of the relevant IP addresses. Warm regards, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 15:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

TfD

I think a potentially very disruptive template is on verge of being kept. If you have time, please take a look at this TfD discussion. Regards. 172 | Talk 21:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

FYI 172 | Talk 23:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Olonets Raion

I think due to several edits the situation under Imperial Russia and the current situation has become entangled in such a way the article is now incorrect. Could you please take a look at it? I also asked Ezhiki to look at it. Errabee 06:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Summary by Alex Bakharev at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen

Your have endorsed the summary by Alex Bakharev at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen which misinforms the community. Alex Bakharev wrote about Russian architecture: "There is no discussion on the talk page, no suggestions on improving the article". In fact there was (and still is) a discussion on the talk page and solution has been proposed. (Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen#Comment_to_the_summary_by_Alex_Bakharev_and_others). I suggest you to withdraw your signature under the summary.--AndriyK 08:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Russian architecture

It looks like your edits at Russian architecture moved the article towards a compromise. But there is a disagreement about a single sentence . Why this sentece is so important? Do you think any further compromise is possible?--Mbuk 22:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Dacha

I don't get what you are talking about in the Dacha article talk page. --GoOdCoNtEnT 18:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)