Misplaced Pages

USER MIKKALAI IS ACCUSED OF VANDALISM IN WIKIPEDIA. SELFISHNESS AND CLEARLY SELF SERVING TACTICS SEEM TO HAVE BECOME THE TRADEMARK OF MR. MIKKALAI, WHO CONTINUES CONTRADICTING HIMSELF, MOST POINTEDLY IN THE WIKIPEDIA'S KVEN ARENA. FOR INSTANCE, MR. MIKKALAI HAS CONTINUED BLOCKING INNOCENT USERS FROM EDITING THE WIKIPEDIA'S KVEN ARTICLE AND FROM FIGHTING OFF THOSE WHO PUSH FALSE INFORMATION TO WIKIPEDIA AND WHO DO NOT BACK UP THEIR INSERTS WITH ANY SOURCES. MR. MIKKALAI BLOCKS OFF THOSE WHO PLAY BY THE RULES, LEAVING IN PEACE THOSE WHO ACT UP AGAINST THE RULES.

WE ALL SHALL BECOME PAID BASED ON OUR DEEDS, INCLUDING MR. MIKKALAI, THE APPARENT SOLDIER OF EVIL. WHY NOT TRY ANOTHER FORUM, MR. MIKKALAI - OR ELSE, PLAY FAIR ? YOUR TACTICS ARE OTHERWISE GOING TO BE USED AGAINST YOURSELF !

On behalf of the entire Misplaced Pages Community - The Swedish Wikipedians worldwide - July 5, 2006

Passée Double

Thanks for your note. Yes, I saw that a very few uses were of a different sort of march (and indeed there is a film called May, among other things). But they don't have to be linked, and being unlinked is better than being linked to the wrong place. Still I am pleased to have achieved edits like this one. Rich Farmbrough 18:16 27 June 2006 (GMT).

Re. Japanese dates

Thank you for providing me with this valuable new information, dear Mikka - in fact, I was merely acting because this particular anonymous user had just been reported at WP:AIV as a recurrent vandal, and who had been blocked just yesterday because of the same editing pattern. Aparently, the lack of any explanation by this editor induced everyone to believe he was merely performing a massive removal of information, and that his activity was nothing but a vandalism spree. I recommend you to make this information available to all the involved parties and the blocking admins, and I leave up to you to instrument the unblocking of the relevant IP addresses. Warm regards, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 15:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

TfD

I think a potentially very disruptive template is on verge of being kept. If you have time, please take a look at this TfD discussion. Regards. 172 | Talk 21:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

FYI 172 | Talk 23:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Olonets Raion

I think due to several edits the situation under Imperial Russia and the current situation has become entangled in such a way the article is now incorrect. Could you please take a look at it? I also asked Ezhiki to look at it. Errabee 06:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Summary by Alex Bakharev at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen

Your have endorsed the summary by Alex Bakharev at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen which misinforms the community. Alex Bakharev wrote about Russian architecture: "There is no discussion on the talk page, no suggestions on improving the article". In fact there was (and still is) a discussion on the talk page and solution has been proposed. (Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/Irpen#Comment_to_the_summary_by_Alex_Bakharev_and_others). I suggest you to withdraw your signature under the summary.--AndriyK 08:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Russian architecture

It looks like your edits at Russian architecture moved the article towards a compromise. But there is a disagreement about a single sentence . Why this sentece is so important? Do you think any further compromise is possible?--Mbuk 22:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Dacha

I don't get what you are talking about in the Dacha article talk page. --GoOdCoNtEnT 18:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Myself and User:Grafikm fr

Salut Circeus,

Ben ecoute, je sais bien que Ghirla est caractériel comme tout. Moi j'ai essayé de le raisonner il y a quelque temps au sujet d'une autre remarque de ce genre, j'ai essayé de le calmer sur sa page de discussion, mais j'ai jamais eu de réponse. C'est clair que c'est un gros dilemme... -- Grafikm 21:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Circeus

Well, I know Ghirla is terribly petulant. I tried to reaso with him some time ago over something similar at his talk page, but I never got any answer. It's areal dilemma

C'est l'impression que les quelques interactions que j'ai eues avec lui (aussi à Template:Languageicon, que j'avais oublié) m'ont laissé. En tout les cas, je persiste et signe concernant le block. Il a été averti par l'ArbCom en Janvier, et de manière répétée par plusieurs utilisateurs depuis. C'est tout juste s'ilne s'est pas bloqué lui-même. Circeus 21:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

That's the impression my other interactions (notably at Template:Languageicon, which I hadforgotten about) with him left me with. In any case, I stand by my block. He got warned by the arbcom in January and repeatedly by various users since. He practically blocked himself

Je suis tout à fait d'accord avec toi. Mais bon, comme on dit "on ne se refait pas". Je vais essayer de lui parler, mais comme il répond meme pas à ses messages, ça va etre un peu difficile... -- Grafikm 21:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree totally with you. But as they say, you don,t teach a dog new trick . I'll try talking to him, but since he doesn't answer messages, that's going to be difficult.

J'avoue que je me demande s'il a même remarqué que le block a(ou devrait être, à tout le moins) expiré. Je suis tenté de lui proposer d'annoncer aux 90 utilisateurs qui ont fait de moi-même et BrianGotts des admnistrateurs qu'ils ont remis des pouvoirs de sysop entre les mains de trolls, mais ça serait un peu exagéré, je crois. De toute façon, ce n'est pas comme s'il tenait à écouter qui que ce soit. Circeus 21:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I almost wonder if he has notice dhis bloc has (or should have, at least) expired. I'tempted to offer him to go and tell the 90 users that made me and briangotts admins that they put the Sysoppowers in the hands of trolls, but that would be toomuch, I think. Besides,it's not like he wants to listen to anybody.

Le truc en fait, c'est qu'en ce moment, il y a un conflit giganstesque sur la partie russe de Misplaced Pages, dont Ghirla s'occupe beaucoup. Il y a des guerres dans tous les sens, c'est un peu le Bronx... Donc en fait, les gens qui sont déjà pas très patients par nature, comme Ghirla, démarrent au quart de tour et en général, ça explose... :( -- Grafikm 21:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

What's going on is that there's this big-ass edit warring in the russian content of Wiki, in which he is very much involved. So people who are already cranky by nature, such as ghirla, areset off and it all explodes.

Je savais que Ghirla était (avait été?) impliqué dans plusieurs disputes concernant l'Ukraine, la Pologne, le Kievan Rus, des translitération et trucs du genre, mais je connaissait pas les détails. Circeus 21:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I knew Ghirla was (had been?) involved with several dispute involving Ukraine, Poland, the Kievan Rus, transliteration and similar stuff, but I wasn't aware of all the details.

Ce qui se passe actuellement, c'est qu'il y a un conflit gigantesque un peu partout entre, en gros, le point de vue consideré comme "pro-russe" ou "pro-sovietique" d'un coté, et des editeurs ukrainiens et/ou polonais un peu radicaux. Personne n'est parfait dans cette histoire, mais ça degenere tres tres vite... -- Grafikm 21:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

What's going on is this widespread conflict between, roughly, a POV described as pro-russian or pro-soviet, and somewhat radical ukrainian and/or polish editors. Nobody's perfect in that story and it degenerates very, very quickly...

Circeus 00:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)