User talk:Cirt/Archive 22 - Misplaced Pages

< User talk:Cirt

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cirt (talk | contribs) at 01:20, 8 October 2014 (OneClickArchiver adding 1 discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:20, 8 October 2014 by Cirt (talk | contribs) (OneClickArchiver adding 1 discussion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Contributions

WikiLove

This user is a featured portal director.

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cirt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

←

Gothel

Hi! I would just like to thank you so much for taking the time to review my Mother Gothel article.--Changedforbetter (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hey Changedforbetter, it may take me a little while to get to it but I'll keep you posted on my progress. — Cirt (talk) 07:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Inside Landmark Forum 2 of 6.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inside Landmark Forum 2 of 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, Stefan2 (talk · contribs), for this notification. I won't be taking any action here, and will instead respectfully defer to the established processes by the Misplaced Pages community. Please also note that the last time I edited that page was over six (6) years ago. — Cirt (talk) 20:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous. Since you had some involvement with the Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tgeairn (talk) 21:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

(The usual notification) Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 21:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, Tgeairn (talk · contribs), for this notification. I won't be participating in this deletion discussion, and will instead respectfully defer to the consensus outcome from the WP:RFD process as determined by the community. Please also note that the last time I edited that page was over four (4) years ago. — Cirt (talk) 21:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Nice comment about my quality improvement project efforts on Misplaced Pages

"I completely agree that both your article quality and work in general here lately at EN are superb." by Tgeairn. — Cirt (talk) 18:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Cult Awareness and Information Centre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cult Awareness and Information Centre is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cult Awareness and Information Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 10:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, Tgeairn (talk · contribs), for this notification. I won't be participating in this deletion discussion, and will instead respectfully defer to the consensus outcome from the WP:AFD process as determined by the community. Please also note that the last time I edited that page was over four (4) years ago. — Cirt (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely, and understood. I am aware that it may be annoying receiving these notifications, but obviously I must continue to notify page creators when nominating an article. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 12:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

I still thank you for the notification, Tgeairn, it is most interesting reading, but please understand my level of article quality these days in pages I use for Quality improvement projects is a bit higher than it was those years ago. For example, the WP:FA quality page, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 12:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Once I wandered into this whole NRM world I went and "checked you out" so-to-speak. I completely agree that both your article quality and work in general here lately at EN are superb. Tgeairn (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words, Tgeairn, I really appreciate that! I encourage you to read through some of my successful Quality improvement projects related to the general topic of freedom of speech. Freedom for the Thought That We Hate is a good example, and I highly recommend you read the book as well. Let me know what you think of the book. — Cirt (talk) 12:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

"I completely agree that both your article quality and work in general here lately at EN are superb." = nicest thing somebody's said about me on Misplaced Pages in a while, thanks again, — Cirt (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Some days we all need a good word! FYI, I picked up the Kindle edition of Freedom for the Thought That We Hate. I didn't get a chance to read it on the flight (work, work, work), but it's now in the queue. Tgeairn (talk) 21:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on this RfC

Hello Cirt, because you participated in the AfD here, you are being asked to comment on the RfC regarding that article and others.

The RfC the link is here.

The question is:

Should we keep these newly created separate country articles about the Ebola epidemic?

Your participation is greatly appreciated. Thanks!

SW3 5DL (talk) 22:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Commented there. — Cirt (talk) 22:36, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

GA candidates to review

~~Paxata~~
~~Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology~~
~~Impedance analogy~~
~~Indoor-outdoor thermometer~~
~~Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle~~

I will review these articles for WP:GA candidacy that were nominated through the WP:GAN process. — Cirt (talk) 11:56, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Reviewed Paxata -- Unfortunately not GA at this time. — Cirt (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Passed Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology as GA. — Cirt (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Added two more to list for review, Indoor-outdoor thermometer and Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle. — Cirt (talk) 18:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Passed Impedance analogy as GA. — Cirt (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Doing next two in increments. Did an image review and also a stability review for both articles Indoor-outdoor thermometer and Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle, next on to rest of review for those two. — Cirt (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Passed Indoor-outdoor thermometer. — Cirt (talk) 02:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Placed Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle as GA on Hold. — Cirt (talk) 02:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Passed Ship's chronometer from HMS Beagle as GA. — Cirt (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Sirkin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Sirkin is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mark Sirkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Thank you, Tgeairn (talk · contribs), for this notification. I won't be participating in this deletion discussion, and will instead respectfully defer to the consensus outcome from the WP:AFD process as determined by the community. Please also note that the last time I edited that page was over seven (7) years ago. — Cirt (talk) 19:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Understood... Thanks (as always) for the response. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 19:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome, Tgeairn (talk · contribs), I feel the replies noting my intention of non-participation in such discussions are appropriate both for cordial discord and documentation purposes. — Cirt (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Next round GA candidates to review

I will review these articles for WP:GA candidacy that were nominated through the WP:GAN process. — Cirt (talk) 05:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Fun Home (musical) placed as GA on Hold. — Cirt (talk) 16:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

For Circus Juventas, asked nominator at Talk:Circus Juventas/GA1 to expand lede intro sect. — Cirt (talk) 17:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Passed Mother Gothel as GA. — Cirt (talk) 17:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Added Nipo T. Strongheart to above list. — Cirt (talk) 17:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Also added The Philaletheis Society. — Cirt (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Posted query about stability of Gary Cooper article to nominator and at Misplaced Pages talk:Good article nominations. — Cirt (talk) 19:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Passed Circus Juventas as GA. — Cirt (talk) 01:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Passed The Philaletheis Society as GA. — Cirt (talk) 01:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Added to review Salman Khan and Suriya to above list. — Cirt (talk) 01:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Left query for nominator on review subpage for Nipo T. Strongheart. — Cirt (talk) 01:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I've closed the nomination for Gary Cooper as not GA at this time, unfortunately, due to stability issues and ongoing conflicts between multiple editors. I left comments and diffs at Talk:Gary Cooper/GA1. — Cirt (talk) 15:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I've closed the nomination for Salman Khan as not GA at this time, unfortunately, due to sourcing issues related to unreferenced chunks of material in a WP:BLP page. — Cirt (talk) 15:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I've closed the nomination for Suriya as not GA at this time, unfortunately, due to sourcing issues related to unreferenced chunks of material in a WP:BLP page. — Cirt (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Marked to review next Katrina Kaif and Emily Ratajkowski. — Cirt (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

My apologies, Smkolins, but I didn't realize I can't do the review for Nipo T. Strongheart as it's under a WikiProject related to a new religious movement. I didn't see that earlier and just thought it was predominantly related to the subsection under which I found the nomination, which was Media and drama. Please ask for a different GA Reviewer to take over. — Cirt (talk) 20:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC) == Updated GA Review notes ==

Fun Home (musical) currently as GA on Hold. Pending reviews for Katrina Kaif and Emily Ratajkowski. Not doing any other GA Reviews at this time, but might pick up other different ones later. — Cirt (talk) 20:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I've worked on Fun Home and posted a preliminary response on the GAR page. Please let me know whether more work is required for the article to pass. Thanks! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Fun Home (musical) passed as GA. — Cirt (talk) 08:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Closed Katrina Kaif as not GA at this time. — Cirt (talk) 14:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Added to pending reviews: Arnaud Tsamere. — Cirt (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Added Image review for Emily Ratajkowski, next on to Stability review. Posted questions about stability of Emily Ratajkowski to the GA nominator. — Cirt (talk) 15:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Added Stability review for Arnaud Tsamere, next on to image review. — Cirt (talk) 17:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Added Image review for Arnaud Tsamere, next on to rest of review. — Cirt (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Added Stability review for Emily Ratajkowski, next on to rest of review. — Cirt (talk) 20:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

To do first: Rest of GA Review for Emily Ratajkowski, then rest of review for Arnaud Tsamere. — Cirt (talk) 21:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Passed article Emily Ratajkowski as GA. — Cirt (talk) 13:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Passed Arnaud Tsamere as GA. — Cirt (talk) 17:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC) ==Parliamentary Monitoring Services==

Hello, Cirt. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Parliamentary Monitoring Services at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much, — Cirt (talk) 00:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

No worries. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)