Misplaced Pages

Talk:Regulation of electronic cigarettes

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cloudjpk (talk | contribs) at 00:45, 13 October 2014 (Regulatory background: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:45, 13 October 2014 by Cloudjpk (talk | contribs) (Regulatory background: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconMedicine List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHealth and fitness List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPharmacology List‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey

Electronic cigarettes are on sale at http://www.elektroniksigaramarkalari.com/ As there is no citation in the article for laws restricting their sale I am changing the text to say they are legal. If you revert to illegal please cite the law. How do I change the color on the map please? Jzlcdh (talk) 17:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

I have updated the picture with the information from Turkey, the map was self made which I have put on Wikicommons. 159753 (talk) 19:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Austria

The refrence does not seem to match the statement. A translation of the page suggests that it only covers one product, and not another. It also mentions containing nicotine. Are we sure that e-cigarettes that do not contain nicotine are medical devices in Austria? AlbinoFerret (talk) 12:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of well sourced material

This text was deleted by Cloudjpk with no explanation, besides a link to a talk page discussion in another article.

Public health experts point out that electronic cigarettes use has been growing rapidly and that no proof of serious health risks has emerged, warning that misguided regulatory action could interfere with a safe substitute for smoking.

References

  1. Bates, Clive (10 September 2014). "Stop demonising a potentially useful product for smokers". The Pharmaceutical Journal. online. Retrieved 25 September 2014. Evidence conflicts with the view that electronic cigarettes are undermining tobacco control or 'renormalising' smoking, and they may be contributing to a reduction in smoking prevalence through increased success at quitting smoking.
  2. McNeill, Ann; Etter, JF. "A critique of a WHO-commissioned report and associated article on electronic cigarettes". Addiction. online. doi:10.1111/add.12730. Retrieved 15 September 2014. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recently commissioned a report reviewing evidence on electronic cigarettes and making policy recommendations. We identify important errors in the description and interpretation of the studies reviewed, and find many of its key conclusions misleading

I would appreciate an explanation on the deletion. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:39, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Regulatory background

The extensive discussion in Talk:Electronic_cigarette#Consensus_for_adding_this establishes there is no consensus for McNeill as a reliable source. Bates is even simpler; he has no scientific or public health credentials. Either reliable sources must be found to source, or these views must be cited as views, not as public health expertise. Cloudjpk (talk) 00:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Categories: