This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MrBill3 (talk | contribs) at 10:10, 24 October 2014 (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Lyme disease. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:10, 24 October 2014 by MrBill3 (talk | contribs) (Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Lyme disease. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lyme disease has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lyme disease was changed by Bubybyb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911251 on 2014-10-23T19:12:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Lyme disease. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 19:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Lyme disease shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrBill3 (talk) 10:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)