Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoyBoy (talk | contribs) at 04:48, 11 July 2006 (signpost). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives of Old Comments:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

ORBCW

Dear Crz, may I remind you that you stated you'd look over Rabbi Shneur Kotler... also, the picture in Rav Levin's article is not ideal, due to the white surrounding on both sides. I think we may need to cut that.

Also, I just had this idea. What do you think of a page where people put down names of Rabbonim they'd like written about (non-existent at the moment though), even if it's just a stub, and after we've evaluated notability etc, a team of editors volunteer to check this page and write up the articles. This would be different from the ORBCW as it only deals with non-existent rabbonim, and and the aim isn't to improve articles or create really detailed ones, although I concede that could happen. What do you think? With many thanks, Nesher 17:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Chuck Marean

I think these edits were also by User:Chuck Marean: after you blocked him. He has made edits with a very similar IP in the past before remembering to login (, , etc), and it fits his MO. --mtz206 (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I'll follow-up on the IP tracking. Meanwhile, he continues to blank his talk page. Is a {Wr4} appropriate? --mtz206 (talk) 15:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Removed "Prod" from Ciaron O'Reilly

Hi,

I've just removed the Prod you applied to Ciaron O'Reilly - it seems to me that he's recieved significant press coverage for his protests. And additionally, he appears on Misplaced Pages:Requested articles/Social Sciences and Philosophy. If you disagree, perhaps we could have an AfD, which would allow for a bit more debate than a Prod? (At least - maybe it's possible to have debates with prods I just haven't worked out how!!).

Cheers,

--JennyRad 15:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

NP. I will consider AfD at a later time. - CrazyRougeian talk/email 15:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Jonathan Edwards (Journalist)

I looked and couldnt find anything about this person; I would still throw in my nom for deletion, but its up to your disgression.--Gephart 18:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Tax case: Gregory

Study tax,... it is the joy of life. Bona Fides 19:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Mboverload

I'm always interested to read your comments in RfAs -- I'm new to the process and you seem to have shrewd insights and high standards.

If you have the time, I'd be interested to get your impressions of the dynamics I'm seeing in Mboverload's RfA. In particular, take a look at the links I posted in opposing comment #2 and supporting comment #24. I was a bit surprised, but then I may be a bit naive about the way some things work around here. My comments were posted after almost all of the votes were cast so most voters never saw these links. Does this sort of phenomenon occur very often in RfAs? (For what it's worth, I have never had any dealings with either admin -- Cyde or Mboverload -- before this RfA.)

I'm not asking for any action on your part -- just curious as to your reaction.

--A. B. 20:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Novardok

Hi Crz, how's it going! Hope all's well. I'd be much obliged if you can look over Novardok yeshiva for me and add your many improvements. Many thanks, Nesher 22:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Someone worth keeping an administrative eye upon...

A new user, User:Mphamilton, has arrived on the seen and is adding some good content and doing some excellent formatting on some West Virginia-related articles. The problem, however, lies in his uploading of copyrighted images with improper tags. He is continuing to do so despite numerous warnings on his talk page. Mind keeping an eye on the situation? This, of course, means I will owe you some copyediting and second opinions. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 22:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I am Back

Hello once Again, I am editing the Electoral District Trintity-Spadina], but it keeps on getting reverted for some odd reason. If I revert once more, I would have supassed the 3 revert rule. My Contributions to the entry our statistical, I don't undersstand why this should be an edit war. Can you please revert it back to my most recent version and censure the IP for it's misuse. Pete Peters 01:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Malacia

Prod'd. Suffix dicdef with full articles on osteomalacia and chondromalacia already existing. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 01:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 10th

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Signpost delivered by: RoyBoy 04:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)