Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ST11 (talk | contribs) at 20:03, 13 November 2014 (→List of nearby objects: list of nearest stars). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

	Astronomy Start‑class Mid‑importance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citations

I do not understand this article needs more citations: There are 3 links to the original science publications over "2MASS" on the internet, the title article is an own citation of an scientific project, in the article there is a table with citations over the organizations who made the scientific project and the data sources. Is anywhere an article on Misplaced Pages with more citations than that article? Vibria (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I am late to answer this question, but quite often readers are looking for inline citations to verify what they are reading is from a reliable source. -- Kheider (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Additional references to add

I'd like to expand this article, so as a placeholder for myself (and other interested editors), I'm putting links/citations for refs to use here.AstroCog (talk) 12:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Use of 2MASS in the 2MASS Redshift Survey (2MRS): article in Universe Today - with full sky image.

"In the course of an infrared census." Sky & Telescope; Feb2000, Vol. 99 Issue 2, p50

"2MASS Treasure Hunt". Sky & Telescope; Dec2000, Vol. 100 Issue 6, p54

"2MASS Project". Astronomy; Apr2001, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p22

"2MASS: Unveiling the Infrared Universe". Sky & Telescope; Jul2001, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p34-42

"How 2MASS Surveyed the Sky". Sky & Telescope; Jul2001, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p38-39

"All-sky survey makes Internet debut". Science News; 4/12/2003, Vol. 163 Issue 15, p237

"Experiments with Wide-Spectrum CCD Imaging". Astronomy; May2002, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p78

"Lost in space? Check the map". Astronomy; Aug2003, Vol. 31 Issue 8, p31

"Nearby Universe Mapped". Discover; Jan2007, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p49-49

"1.5 million galaxies revealed". Astronomy; Mar2008, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p41-43

"Alien visitor from afar". Science News; 7/4/2009, Vol. 176 Issue 1, p9-9

"The 2MASS Large Galaxy Atlas". T. H. Jarrett et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 125 525

Notability

There is a discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Astronomical objects#WISE object notability and Talk:WISEPC J150649.97+702736.0#Notability that has implications for 2MASS objects.

Specifically, the question being asked is whether a slightly more liberal notability test is appropriate for the closest objects to Sol, such as the nearest brown dwarfs discovered by WISE.

Comments welcome either here or on either of those two pages. The discussion on the WISE page should of course focus on WISE objects, that here on 2MASS objects, and that on the WikiProject talk page on astronomical objects generally. But there's some interconnection, equally obviously. Andrewa (talk) 07:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

At the moment 2MASS survey is referred in numerous scientific papers. Where to find additional citations for impact this survey had on astronomy? --Artman40 (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

List of nearby objects

This table is not a useful addition to the article, for several reasons.

• no explanation is given in the article as to why this information is important or relevant.
• it violates NPOV, giving extremely excessive weight to a tiny aspect of the 2MASS survey.
• it seems to be original research, having been compiled by a wikipedia editor rather than sourced from a reference.

No good reason has been given for its inclusion by the editor who is trying to force it in. The article is short so leave it in? Not a good reason. People have asked specifically for this information? Who? When? I suggested making a new article for this, which would be a perfectly good solution if you feel this information is valuable. Why did you reject that option? 201.215.187.159 (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

"I don't like it" is not a good reason to blank material. Feel free to expand the article and/or create a section discussing 2MASS galaxies. There are people that are curious as to some of the closest objects discovered/studied by 2MASS. -- Kheider (talk) 11:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

And I've removed it again. WP:UNDUE states that we must not give certain aspects of a situation undue weight over others. By including this table, nearby stars are given massively undue weight over much more scientifically important discoveries such as quasars and neutron stars. We already have list of nearest stars for information like this. StringTheory11 (t • c) 20:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Kirkpatrick2012 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
2. Cite error: The named reference Goldman2010 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

• Start-Class Astronomy articles
• Mid-importance Astronomy articles
• Start-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance