Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Signedzzz (talk | contribs) at 16:37, 16 November 2014 (→Can you please revert your edit: no). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Big improvement on the neutrality od the Boko Haram background section. Thanks! 173.74.85.245 (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

How do you mean exactly? zzz (talk) 16:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your welcome, I guess zzz (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The edit to remove the section that was not well written. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Boko_Haram&diff=632424781&oldid=632377590 173.74.85.245 (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.zzz (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Onymous may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], ] and ].<ref name=crypto/> Agora already offered more listings than Silk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

2014 Hong Kong protest

If you find one of sources used in the article unreliable, go to Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and ask about it. (That's someone else's suggestion, by the way.) --George Ho (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Do not suppress different opinions and remove contents without due justification. You will be reported to administrator if continuing to do so.

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Recreational drug use

added links pointing to DMT and Synthesize

Operation Onymous

added a link pointing to Tweet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Can you please revert your edit

You recently made changes to the article Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in this edit. I was notified of the situation by a fellow editor who correctly noted that the content had been decided on by the careful seeking of consensus as you will see through reference at Talk:ISIL. Please can you revert the edit. Gregkaye ✍♪ 14:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

I think my edit improves the article immensely, so I can't revert the edit. I explained the reasons in the edit summary. Sometimes editors get too attached to excess verbiage, and it requires someone else who hasn't been involved in its production to see what needs to go. The lead is clearly too long, and I identified the bits that just aren't worthwhile. I can only suggest you seek another opinion from another fresh pair of eyes. I believe the article is much better with the edit - I'm either right or wrong, I guess! If you want to add back

• the supposed "claims and aims" (According to who? when? depending on what? who thinks/believes any of this? etc) in the lead, and then finish with
• "The group's actions, authority and theological interpretations have been widely criticized around the world and notably within the Muslim community." (Why would you think that anyone needs to read that, exactly? What information does that impart? Etc...)

then I suggest you think of a reason for doing so. (Better than "that's what *we* decided")! zzz (talk) 16:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)