Misplaced Pages

User talk:Igor the bunny

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legacypac (talk | contribs) at 05:48, 28 December 2014 (Undid revision 639906546 by Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk) the dust has not even settled - active ANi still open). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:48, 28 December 2014 by Legacypac (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 639906546 by Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk) the dust has not even settled - active ANi still open)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

December 2014

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Jehochman 04:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Igor the bunny (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

utterly wrong reasoning. No 'disruptive editing'. I see no valid reason for this block, and it prevents me answering to queries on ANI. If you think the block is valid, show me a diff of a claimed 'disruptive edit' - otherwise, ffs, let me carry on the discussion.

Decline reason:

Once you admitted you were familiar with Misplaced Pages it became unreasonable to see your edits as good faith. Chillum 04:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}}

Chillum, which of my edits were not 'good faith'?

I am trying to discuss new user articles - surely nothing more important?

What have I done to disrupt wikiipedia?

Seriously, what edits have I made that disrupted anything at all?

The idea of blocking is to prevent disruption, right? So - what have I done?

I was asked on ANI, "Would you care to tell us the name of the account you were last blocked/banned under?" - yes, I will do that, if neccesary, to an appropriate person in confidence. (an OS or something; pref Gorilla if she's around)

The discussion on Jim's talk has been summarily shut down. I didn't even start the discussion!

Why have I been blocked?

What do I do to 'fix' it?

Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk)

If unblocked, I want to undo this because a) I didn't start the discussion, b) I am not a troll, c) it's a valid discussion. Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk) 04:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

You can email me the name of your prior account. You can not add BLP prod to the biography of a notable person who's long dead. You can stop using crude language needlessly. I don't care what happened before. Just agree to stop wasting other editors time with such nonsense. Jehochman 04:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
What the hell is this? I've looked through this account's editing history and I don't see any reason for an indef block. There are plenty of reasons users can show up knowing their way around the encyclopedia (long-term IP editors creating accounts, clean starts, etc.) and I don't see any reason to believe this account is acting disruptively. I don't feel like this user is using "crude language needlessly", and that seems like a silly thing to fixate on for an unblock discussion. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Seconded. My very first edit was a PROD. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Igor the bunny (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Per above. At least, if not, tell me why I am blocked. Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk) 05:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I don't believe this user is here to disrupt. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

For background, see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Igor the facetious xmas bunny - NOT HERE. EdJohnston (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
I've seen it. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Bored now.

Blocked for 'disruptive editing' with no diffs, no warnings, no explanation.

And even with an arb/OS/CU saying why it's wrong, I'm still not able to edit.

Sucks. Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk) 05:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Unblocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Yup. Sucks for anyone dealing with your disruption. New acct today first edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=639884359 swearing on Jimbo's talk page about speedy deletions. Shortly after inappropriately try two speedy deletes. Race around acting stupid. Admit you have another account. Wonder why you get blocked. Cry to a sympathetic admin, appearently off wikipedia as blocked already. Legacypac (talk) 05:43, 28 December 2014 (UTC)