This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bladesmulti (talk | contribs) at 05:26, 5 January 2015 (Undid revision 641043291 by EoRdE6 (talk) if that's not your issue, then avoid this busibody behavior). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:26, 5 January 2015 by Bladesmulti (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 641043291 by EoRdE6 (talk) if that's not your issue, then avoid this busibody behavior)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Special wishes...
Hafspajen (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Season's Greetings
Ekdalian (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Enneagram
Blades, which Enneagram type are you? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- 5th one. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- And you, Josh ? Hafspajen (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- 5? Okay, fits the picture. I'm a 4, with a strong 5-wing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ah. That explains EVERYTHING: Hafspajen (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- And you, Josh ? Hafspajen (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Sure? And you? Also a 4? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- But some guy who made a test once said 9 actually, now I remembered. Hafspajen (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Tibetan culture
Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Talk:Tibetan culture.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hafspajen (talk) 13:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Blade will assist at the Tibetan culture? Hafspajen (talk) 14:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Just looked into it. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Blade will assist at the Tibetan culture? Hafspajen (talk) 14:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Well, well
A well is a hole in the ground that you get either clean water or dirty oil out of. In your case, the Notification feature told me that you had put a message on my talk page. On research, it appears that you subtracted a post from my talk page. It appears that an IP had posted to AN or ANI, and that I had notified the IP that they should have notified the subject, and I notified the subject, and the IP then said that they had forgotten to notify. Now you removed the message from the IP, because the IP has been determined to be a sockpuppet for a user who was banned in 2007. Any user who was banned that long ago could get unbanned if they would just be quiet for a year without engaging in sockpuppetry. I know that in general it is a policy that posts by banned users can be reverted. In this case, I think that reverting the post was neutral, neither useful nor harmful, but if reverting everything is simpler than selecting what to revert, that is all right. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for writing. Bladesmulti (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Editing Articles
As you stated on the user page, you should let others edit your articles. Possessiveness of articles is covered by the policy on article ownership and is not permitted. Editing the articles in the articles is normally a minor edit. It is typically only necessary if English was a second language for the original author. In the Latin Misplaced Pages, there are no articles in the articles. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes and I never had a problem with that. Bladesmulti (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
The dirt hits the fan
Now let's see where the shit comes down... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes it is troubling and some of them are autoconfirmed users. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Talkback for Tehran
Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Rye-96's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Tibetan culture
Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Talk:Tibetan culture.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
. Joshua Jonathan - please you too. I think we need to adopt a Tibetan. I don't want to leave a message on your talk because certain editors there might make this into a controversy very soon, I do not wish to get this newbie bitten. Hafspajen (talk) 13:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- I could do better only if I had more time because I am currently dealing with multiple sock masters. Although still check every article where I am actually interested. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK; when you fixed that, than. Socking is a major dishonesty and suks.Hafspajen (talk) 15:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
January 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marsh Mokhtari. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. EoRdE6 04:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- EoRdE6 I am allowed to revert the ridiculous IP hopping and banned(not blocked, its actually banned) sock version restoring. Tell me that you know nothing about what is going on that page. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- I see no proof whatsoever that this user is a sock, and his version of the article seems better and has sources. I suggest opening the SPI, which I just read through, to find conclusive evidence, or telling me why you're so convinced he is a sock. EoRdE6 04:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Can't you see the ridiculous IP socking? It is enough for understanding that there is sock puppetry going on. SPI is not for reporting IP hopping, only RFPP is available for that. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)