This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ceoil (talk | contribs) at 22:52, 17 July 2006 (box). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:52, 17 July 2006 by Ceoil (talk | contribs) (box)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Mayhem
Here's me again. I think those three new sections are unnecessary. Wolf's Lair Abyss (1995-1999), Grand Declaration of War (2000-2003) and Chimera (2004-present). The article is too fragmented and everything in one piece was quite sufficient. It is the band biography section and not album release info. I'm not sure about this but it looked better before especialy because nothing significant happend in 95 to 99 when Wolf's Lair Abyss was released. Feel free to contact me and say what you think! Death2 23:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a problem i changed the opening line thing. You removed Mayhem is, and replaced with seminal. I reinserted Mayhem is a seminal Norwegian black metal... Just take a look at the very first line of the article. See you. Death2 00:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for messing up the Mayhem article. By the way learn how to spell correctly or buy a dictionary. I'll leave you with your little playground now. Death2 20:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hint's and tips
You could re-insert Image:Mayhem current lineup.jpg to Mayhem's page and place Deathcrush pic somewhere down the article (maybe in the discography section where it was, it looks nice there). Death2 16:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry but the article seems a bit over-done :) You can start by removing a couple of pics (Euronymous with the sword???, way too many portraying two members which are now gone for a long time) and sweep the text through a spelling checker (MS word or something). As you may noticed I'm not doing to much edits lately too much better things in life to do than waste time on this usseles and non-essential project... Death2 21:10, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Pierre S Rosen
Hi, you listed Pierre S Rosen for deletion and followed the steps correctly except that you posted the reasons why the article should be deleted on the Talk page of Pierre S Rosen rather than the AfD log. I completed the AfD and it can be found here. I think you are right to list this article for deletion, thanks for helping to clean up Misplaced Pages. MLA 08:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Bryansmyth.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bryansmyth.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
AfD
No, I can combine those into two, I'll let you know when I'm done (in about 5 minutes). -- Northenglish (talk) -- 22:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
On second thought, I've decided it's best not to do it after the fact. However, for future reference, read How to list multiple related pages for deletion. And of course, remember to vote in the AfD debate that I put up. ;-) -- Northenglish (talk) -- 22:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Brian Boru
Thanks, for your note :) Its always nice to hear work is appreciated :) - FrancisTyers · 23:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh the shame...
How can you show your face in public? - brenneman 00:35, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
mayhem
I don't see really any problem with it except in some individual cases, viz. Varg and Blackthorn; the later since it is linked to a band. Spearhead 08:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
List of Irish Music Collectors
This is regarding your comment in your revision to this page, "Should this be a category rather than list." Lists and categories are not interchangeable; lists have several advantages, so I see no reason why the list entry shouldn't stay. It still needs a fair amount of work though. I think the biggest problem right now is, it's really not a list (as I mentioned on the talk page).
I've left messages to Durrus several times asking him to get more familiar with the style guide, stop using sentence fragments, stop inserting empty headers, etc., but he still seems to be making a mess everywhere he goes. Seems to have lots of good information, but it looks like a team of editors need to follow him around and clean up. Dsreyn 04:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I take the points being made and perhaps the more substantial entries here should have their own page, trying to incorporate the editorial comments. Durrus 19:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)