This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flinders Petrie (talk | contribs) at 16:30, 17 February 2015 (→A guard kitten for you!: new WikiLove message). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:30, 17 February 2015 by Flinders Petrie (talk | contribs) (→A guard kitten for you!: new WikiLove message)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Talk Israel thread: This article details Jewish casualties but not Arab casualties, is it giving a NPOV?
You started the above named RfC thread recently. I have recently added a subheading restating the initial question as I considered that the discussion was veering off topic. I know that you also added other perspectives / rephrasings in regard to this question which I may have reverted and thought you should be aware that I have only gone as far as to refer back to the original question.
I would also be interested in hearing of specific reverts of information that I think that I would regard to be Censored.
GregKaye 12:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your work on editing the Israel article. I do not think the article has a NPOV, and I think it is pro-Jewish and anti-Arab. The article details many events with fewer than 50 Jewish deaths, such as the “On 11 March 1978, a PLO guerilla raid from Lebanon led to the Coastal Road Massacre, in which 38 Israeli civilians were killed and 71 injured” statement in the article. When I tried to add references to events with greater than 50 non-Jewish deaths, such as the Deir Yassin massacre and King David Hotel bombing, they where immediately reverted, and there is still no mention of these events in the article. When I tried to add casualty numbers to the one sentence referencing the 1936–39 Arab revolt in Palestine, this change was also reverted. I believe all these events are at least as relevant to Israel's history as the Coastal Road Massacre, and should be included in a NPOV article. I believe they we deleted because most of the editors want an article that reflects their pro-Jewish/anti-Arab bias, and not a NPOV article. I am not Arab or Jewish, I have no bias feelings either way on the subject, and I am only interested in seeing a NPOV article. Gouncbeatduke (talk)
Semi-protection
I've semi'd the page due to harassment. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- On a side note, I'd like to ask that whomever is posting the death threats and so on stop. Seriously, this is not the way to go about accomplishing things and it has been reported. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
A guard kitten for you!
Couldn't help but to see that thread on ANI and thought your talk page could use some cheer and fuzzy protection in light of it. Keep up the good work and don't let childish behaviour deter you!
Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | 28 Shevat 5775 16:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)