This is an old revision of this page, as edited by T Cells (talk | contribs) at 16:56, 18 February 2015 (→Information). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:56, 18 February 2015 by T Cells (talk | contribs) (→Information)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Status: Unknown
|
This is AKS.9955's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
Archives | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
William Red Fish
Hello, I have many credible sources, seeming as how I am the person that this is about. I'm in this band and we are just trying to expand our online reach, one of the attempts being us creating our own biography's for our fans. What do I need to do to keep this page up? Ftr4life (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC) William Laurence Fish
- Dear Ftr4life. Few points. 1) Any biographical article should pass guidelines. Please read WP:BLP. 2) Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox or means of promotion. Please refer WP:NOTADVERTISING. 3) Self published sources are not acceptable. Read WP:BLPSPS. 4) For articles related to yourself, please read WP:BIOSELF. Trust this explains. Cheers Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Im not trying to advertise, Im educating people on this band. BECAUSE THEY WANT TO KNOW THESE THINGS ABOUT THE MEMBERS so instead of us having to take the time out of our extremely busy days to answer ever single question all of our 25,000 fans have, they can come here and find out themselves. Im pretty sure youre just trying to look for reasons to get articles off Misplaced Pages. There is nothing fake or untrue about this article, and if you want to get real technical, Im not doing ANYTHING wrong because this is the band wiki account and I DIDNT TYPE A WORD OF THIS ARTICLE minus the citations, as you demanded. Ftr4life (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Ftr4life: Pardon the interruption, but technically, if it's the band's Misplaced Pages account, you're in violation of the username policy and related prohibition against shared accounts.
- That said, if the band keeps getting these questions, it should get itself a website. Misplaced Pages is not a webhost; it's an encyclopedia, and bands don't get articles until they become notable bands.
- Please see also the essay Misplaced Pages:No one cares about your garage band. Best regards —C.Fred (talk) 19:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Ftr4life: Another interruption. Hasn't the band got a website or a Facebook page where this info can be given? Misplaced Pages is NOT free web space or another form of social media. We aren't looking just to get articles off Misplaced Pages. What we are doing is making sure that the ones here fit our rules and requirements. Remember that there is NO right to have an article here. Peridon (talk) 12:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
ORG
A7 is a mixed kettle of fish. It's originally for not (credibly...) claimed significant people or groups of people (but when talking to an author, refer to notability as claims to significance merely stave off CSD - notability is going to be needed for prod and AfD...). ORG is specifically for organisations and the particular organisation should be named. Ideas about organisation don't come in under A7, and nor do products of organisations. The people part of A7 is fairly clear, but the other bits are often misunderstood. Animals have to be named - Gertie the Acrobatic Sloth would come under A7, but Hattus fedora wouldn't as it's a species of rodent. (That one is a very blatant hoax anyway, but probably Gertie would be too...) Web content includes YouTube and MMPORG stuff, web sites and anything you do through a browser and an ISP. Browsers themselves and other installed software do not come into A7. Events must be organised, and spontaneous riots don't come in. (Actually, most 'spontaneous' riots ARE organised carefully, but you have to be certain that they are.) OK? CSD is a minefield inside a maze (but so is quite a bit of behind the scenes Misplaced Pages). Don't be afraid to ask. Some admins have rather more inclusive ideas than others, so I'll suggest me or GBfan for middle of the road, and DGG for stricter interpretations. (There are even stricter ones, but they rarely or never venture into the murky waters of CSD, preferring to philosophise on the banks... This is a sore point with me on the Talk page of the cat for CSD.) Peridon (talk) 12:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Article Chris Diaz business
thank you. am willing to be guided by seasoned editors to help improve this articleDeibrek (talk) 14:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Your articles
I randomly reviewed some of your recently created articles (stubs), although they're articles on notable topics but the written style seemed to be very poor to me. For example, Vivek Chaand Sehgal introduction section was unsourced and the content of the "early life" section does not reflect the lead title. You even created an empty sections, what I considered inappropriate. I decided not to point this out at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled#AKS.9955 to avoid any embarrassment. I suggest you should review your articles again to fix the blunders. Cheers! Wikic¤l¤gy 21:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Wikic¤l¤gy. Thanks for your comment. On 10th Feb, Delhi assembly results were announced and the same day I had written articles for 40 new MLAs (with in-use tag on them). Tags have been removed but I am still expanding the articles one by one. You can see it here, here, here, here, here and here. I am sure that none of the people I have written about fail WP:BLP or WP:BIO. As far as Vivek Chaand Sehgal is concerned, nothing is unsourced but I did make a mistake there of adding Forbes source to the wrong section. The reference belong to the lead section and I will move it right away. Trust this explains. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sarpin
Don't delete please!Muhammad Nafi (talk) 07:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sir, Please don't aspire deletion the word of SARPIN in this Misplaced Pages. It's our Indonesian slang of language and really meaningful for our country. Thanks a lot for your understanding.
My best Regards Muhammad Nafi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammad Nafi (talk • contribs) 07:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Muhammad Nafi, thanks for your message and for your contribution to Misplaced Pages. Please note that I don't have the authority to delete any article on Misplaced Pages and have merely recommended it for deletion as it does not comply with Misplaced Pages policy. Please note that Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary (read WP:NAD for details). Happy editing. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
A7 of Ms. Perry Cabo
Hello, just to advise you that pages like that, which contain only attacks or negative information about apparently living people should be marked as G10 not A7. Valenciano (talk) 11:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Valenciano. Will do. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
A note on deletions
Namaste,
Please note that WP:AfD is only for nominating articles whose deletion may be controversial. For non-controversial articles such as Snita, which are obviously meant to be deleted, please nominate them for speedy deletion instead. If the article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, use WP:Proposed deletion. In case of Snita, WP:CSD#A7 applies. AfD involves creating a page for discussing the deletion which is not necessary for obvious cases. Thank you. SD0001 (talk) 13:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Namaste SD0001, thanks for your feedback. Yes, I have been pointed out about that by two more senior editors and am trying to improve on my judgment between AfD and CSD. I hope someone will not have to point that out again. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Likewise for Mohammad Mehroz Saqib: there was no need for an AFD for this. It might be a good idea to take a break from creating new AFD discussions for a while, until you're more familiar with WP:CSD policy. Thanks, Dai Pritchard (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Your rationale at AfDs
Thanks for your contributions, Misplaced Pages appreciates your help but unfortunately one or more of your rationale for articles deletion at AfDs seemed not to be appropriates to me, such as this AfD and this AfD. Subject of an article cannot failsWP:What Misplaced Pages is not in the case of this your rationale here. Please see-Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Maleke where i initially replied you. I strongly suggest that you make no further nomination until you are familiar with policies. Wikic¤l¤gy 10:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Wikic¤l¤gy, thanks for your feedback. If I understood you correctly; you are talking about two nominations by me; viz 1) This and 2) This. 1) I had already marked the article as tentative delete where you assumed I am talking about the subject of the article; which I was not. Yes, I should have been more specific in the reason. 2) When did I ever mention the subject of the article as the reason? All I said was that the song lyrics comprise the entire article and have mentioned the apt reason i.e. WP:NOTLYRICS.
- I am sure everyone knows that not 100% of the nominations OR the reasons given by the nominator can be accurate and that's exactly the point of Articles for discussion. If the nomination is found correct then the article is deleted and v.v. Yes, you pointed out and I have made a note of that but till the time I am not vandalizing articles, spamming or acting out of personal reasons, I don't think I will stop editing on Misplaced Pages; AfD included. All actions are a learning for all of us; both me and you included. I appreciate your feedback and I take it for what its worth but my humble request to you is lets not get into fault finding mission here. Trust me message will be taken in the right spirit. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Don't take it too personal, I never requested that you should stop editing on wikipedia neither am I insinuating that you should not comment at AfD. I only suggested that you should take a break from creating deletion discussion for a while, until you're familiar with basic policies. Dai Pritchard made similar suggestion earlier in a discussion I never participated. However, there is a relationship between the "subject" of an article and "content" of an article. The content of an article depends on the subject of an article but if otherwise, then the article becomes an "Hoax" and you will tag it appropriately for speedy deletion not to take it to AfD for discussion. WP:AfD is only for nominating articles whose deletion may be controversial particularly in terms of the subject notability. It is often wrong to say that an article fails a policy for example, it is wrong to say that an article fails WP:BLP, WP:What Misplaced Pages is not or WP:OR. But content or wikipedia editor can violate any of them. Don't use the word Fails instead use violate for policy-based rationale. Only use fails for guideline-based rational. For example fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:NMUSIC, WP:ACTOR and so on. Wikic¤l¤gy 16:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Information
- Dear Wikic¤l¤gy & SD0001, further to your messages above, I would like to assure you that I am working on improving on the area. I need little information from you (could not find it myself). Is there a way (apart from looking at my contribution list) to find out which articles have I nominated for CSD and AfD? That way I will be able to review what I have done in the past and where I need to improve. Please advice. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Don't worry about the pages you tagged wrongly, you only need to read and understand WP:CSD to nominate an article for speedy deletion. Use this tool to review your AfDs. Happy editing! :) Wikic¤l¤gy 16:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)