This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 1027E (talk | contribs) at 14:16, 23 February 2015 (Complaint about editor Mbinebri who has prejudice.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:16, 23 February 2015 by 1027E (talk | contribs) (Complaint about editor Mbinebri who has prejudice.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) ← Back to ContentsView Latest IssueFrom the editors
We want to know what you think!
Contribute — Share this By PineDear Signpost readers,
Thank you for reading. We would appreciate your input about what you like about the Signpost and how we can improve. Please take this anonymous Qualtrics survey that we link below. We don't ask for your username, email, or real name. We appreciate your honest opinions. The survey may take five to ten minutes to complete.
Our thanks go to the Wikimedia Foundation's Learning and Evaluation Team for letting us use Qualtrics.
- Survey link
- The password is: FebruarySurvey (which is case-sensitive)
Sincerely,
Pine, Signpost Publication and Newsroom Manager
Discuss this story
These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.- Great - except that there is no way to log in to the poll. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Kudpung: the password is right below the survey link. --Pine 11:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- The survey makes a few references to the Wikimedia Blog. Here's a link to it. Tony (talk) 11:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I never read the blog. I spend too much time reading and deleting the crap that comes in through the New Pages Feed and gets poorly patrolled... --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah. I don't read the blog either ... it's just one thing that drops off the huge list of things I'd like to do on WMF sites but don't have time for. But I think the comparison is interesting—hard to do, actually, in terms of the whole of the Signpost vs the blog, rather than individual pages. Tony (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I never read the blog. I spend too much time reading and deleting the crap that comes in through the New Pages Feed and gets poorly patrolled... --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- The survey makes a few references to the Wikimedia Blog. Here's a link to it. Tony (talk) 11:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- I gave up on it. The software kept telling me I had to answer all the questions, but the layout was so confusing that I couldn't find the blanks. The layout goes WAY, WAY off the side of the screen. I appreciate the work that has gone into this, but it is not very professional. Also, some of the questions were really confusing and unanswerable. GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi GeorgeLouis. Thank you for your feedback. What device were you using to complete the survey? I only tested it on a desktop and laptop computer. Were there any specific questions you found confusing? We are always looking to improve how we seek to improve as well. Also pinging Pine, as he took the lead on this project, so he might be able to answer questions better than I. Go Phightins! 03:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi GeorgeLouis, it sounds like you are trying to take the survey on a mobile device. I suggest that you use a laptop or desktop instead if your mobile device has trouble with the Qualtrics pages. Thank you, --Pine 02:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- To keep the archives happy: Results from this survey were posted at File:Signpost_February_2015_survey_results.pdf, and also discussed in this editorial. Regards, HaeB (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deletion because of prejudice
This is what I think of Wiki today, unfortunately: not objective, negative and therefor self defeating. Why? Read:
I need the help from good reliable editor for wiki concerning the following article of Errol Sawyer: Mbinebri, you again for the fourth time???? Your endeavors to delete this article of a good photographer starts to look the more and more like like a personal crusade? Why do you disresepect this good African-American artist? You give Misplaced Pages a bad name! Read:
7. Individuals with agendas sometimes have significant editing authority. Administrators on Misplaced Pages have the power to delete or disallow comments or articles they disagree with and support the viewpoints they approve. For example, beginning in 2003, U.K. scientist William Connolley became a Web site administrator and subsequently wrote or rewrote more than 5,000 Misplaced Pages articles supporting the concept of climate change and global warming. More importantly, he used his authority to ban more than 2,000 contributors with opposing viewpoints from making further contributions.
5. There is little diversity among editors. According to a 2009 survey by the Wikimedia Foundation, 87 percent of Misplaced Pages editors are male, with an average age of 26.8 years. According to executive director Sue Gardner, they hail mostly from Europe and North America, and many of them are in graduate school.
4. The number of active Misplaced Pages editors has flatlined. The number of active Misplaced Pages editors (those who make at least five edits a month) has stopped growing. It remains to be seen whether the current number of active editors can maintain and continue updating Misplaced Pages.
3. It has become harder for casual participants to contribute. According to the Palo Alto Research Center, the contributions of casual and new contributors are being reversed at a much greater rate than several years ago. The result is that a steady group of high-level editors has more control over Misplaced Pages than ever.
A group of editors known as “deletionists” are said to “edit first and ask questions later,” making it harder for new contributors to participate, and making it harder for Misplaced Pages—which, again, aspires to provide “the sum of all human knowledge”—to overcome the issue that it is controlled by a stagnant pool of editors from a limited demographic.
To fill you in: Sawyer is an accomplished artist: Read not only his his last interview on the WSW by Richard Philips, but also read what the ex museum director Julian Spalding writes about him on his own website and read what A. D. Coleman (first photo critic of the New York Times) writes about his work in his book "City" Mosaic and on his own website. Also Sawyer's work is present in several important museum collections around the world which gives already the status of importance that he needs to have an article in Misplaced Pages. I suggest that you help to improve this article instead of suggest deletion. It is very important that Errol Sawyer, considered as having equal value as the African-American photographer Roy Decarava, has an article in WIki UK as he is a role model for the African-American community. I will ask the advise of more editors as I suspect prejudice from Mbinebri's side.
Category: