This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gamaliel (talk | contribs) at 20:58, 25 March 2015 (→Free for a PR?: Hello folks, it would be really great if you did not refer to people of minority races as monkeys. Thank you.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:58, 25 March 2015 by Gamaliel (talk | contribs) (→Free for a PR?: Hello folks, it would be really great if you did not refer to people of minority races as monkeys. Thank you.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Please leave a message; I'll reply here.
| This is Cassianto's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
barnstar
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| for suggesting that all should not respond to baiting, not just admins. But admins should since they have the blocking tool Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC) |
- Thanks, but admins would not be allowed to use their tools if it were a personal thing. They would have to go elsewhere to ask someone else as otherwise it could be seen as a conflict of interests. If they did sort their problem out themselves, I would be asking questions. Cassianto 20:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The Tower House
I've just lost all my bloody responses to you in an edit conflict! KJP1 (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Don't panic, go back one and copy and paste. Cassianto 16:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Think it worked. KJP1 (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Thankyou for your input into the peer review. The article is now at FAC. Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Very much appreciate your input into the article and your Support. KJP1 (talk) 05:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Enthiran/archive2
I have opened the 2nd PR as the article's first FAC is withdrawn due to MoS issues. Feel free to leave comments. 
— Ssven2 14:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Margaret Bondfield
Last year you kindly contributed to the above article's peer review or or FAC or both. An issue has arisen from yesterday's TFA appearance, and is under discussion on the article's talk. Briefly: an editor added into the text the cited information that Bondfield's was privately known as "Maggie", and then incorporated this into the lead so the subject appeared as Margaret Grace ("Maggie") Bondfield. I have removed the nickname from the lead, and stated my position on the talkpage. I would be pleased if you could visit and briefly comment there. Brianboulton (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Free for a PR?
Hi Cass, You were kind enough to comment at PR and FAC on Casino Royale; could I ask for a similar favour for the next instalment of the Bond series: Live and Let Die, which is now at PR? Any thoughts or comments would be greatly appreciated. Cheers – SchroCat (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Whatever happened to "uninvolved" re: blocks? We hope (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Nowt surprises me round here any more! We've all seen much, much worse going on and no action taken, but if t's someone who has an opposing opinion to you, it's aneasy decision to take, - SchroCat (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Whatever happened to "uninvolved" re: blocks? We hope (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)