Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Conservatism

Welcome to the talk page for WikiProject Conservatism
Here you can find discussions, notices, and requests for articles that in some way deal with conservatism. If you would like to discuss, place a notice about, or if you have a request about, an article within the scope of this project, please do include it here.

Shortcut

WT:RIGHT

To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all WikiProject Conservatism talk pages redirect here, except for The Right Stuff.

Although it is very appropriate to post messages here asking for editing help or to inform about discussions concerning pages within the scope of this project, please note that posting here in order to try to recruit editors with a particular political point of view is contrary to the intent of this project, and may be regarded as a violation of the WP:Canvassing guideline.

This project page was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep (references page), 2 September 2014, see discussion.
Keep, 7 October 2011, see discussion.

This article was nominated for deletion review on 10 October 2014. The result of the discussion was Endorsement of Keep Closure for the (references page).

This project does not extol any point of view, political or otherwise,
other than that of a neutral documentarian.

view · edit Frequently asked questions

Q: An article was erroneously tagged by a member of this project.

A: Do not remove the banner. Ask the member why they tagged it, or post a message at the project talk page (below). Note: the banner does not imply that the subject has a conservative or right-wing ideology, has no relevance to neutral POV, nor that WikiProject Conservatism owns the article.

Q: I'm a member and the banner I added to an article talk page was removed.

A: From PROGGUIDE: You may not force them to remove the banner. No editor may prohibit a group of editors from showing their interest in an article. This warning {{WPRYT Uw-banner}} can be used to notify an editor of the guideline.

Q: Can non-members tag articles?

A: Yes, but if a member removes the banner do not replace it.

Q: The quality or importance rating of an article is incorrect.

A: Anyone can change the rating. Make sure to consult the assessment scale here. Ratings are subjective, importance ratings in particular can be controversial. Disputes will be resolved by project members at the project talk page (below).

Q: What is the scope of this WikiProject?

A: As stated on the main page of this project, we are dedicated to improving articles related to conservatism, not limited to any particular form or national variety of conservatism.

To-do list for WP:WikiProject Conservatism: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2024-09-19

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Articles needing immediate attention : 23 articles needing attention
Articles needing expert attention : 0 articles needing attention
Alerts : monitor Article alerts
Disputes : help resolve NPOV disputes (Feature defunct)
Viewpoints : review Viewpoints needed (Feature defunct)
Vandalism : monitor the Vandalism Watchlist and fight vandalism!
New articles : check the New articles listing and nominate for DYK
Assess : add quality and importance ratings Unassessed articles report

Conservatism Project‑class

	Conservatism portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Project	This page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Request assessment: New Labour, New Danger

It is requested that a member assess the quality and/or importance of the following article:

Comments:

Request help with Southern Strategy page

Recently I have tried to add some descending views to the Southern Strategy article. I feel like the editors who are watching the article are very quick to try to tear down articles which refute the general thrust of the article but very tolerant of poorly referenced claims or articles that support the racist GOP plan hypothesis. I can understand that the editors with a particular bias (we all have biases so that is not meant as an attack) would be more likely to tend articles of interest to them. That said, I would appreciate any help that can be offered as I'm sure I'm not as good at navigating the world of wikipedia when compared to the other editors. This article was previously cited as being of concern and the article talk page makes that history clear. ] --Getoverpops (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton

Interested project members are welcome to join WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton, a collaborative project dedicated to improving Misplaced Pages articles related to HRC. Joining the project is in no way an endorsement of her or her political positions; in fact, it would be great to have people with a variety of political ideologies participating for the sake of NPOV. There are many articles to work on, and certainly she will be in the news for the foreseeable future, so thank you for your consideration. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:26, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Bandy ball

I am curious – this is funny – about why bandy ball was listed as a new article relevant to this project. :-) Snowsuit Wearer (talk|contribs) 19:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

RfD notification: Conservative news

Conservative news has been nominated at RfD. Your input at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 April 27#Conservative news would be appreciated. --BDD (talk) 13:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Request re-assessment for article, Carly Fiorina

I've been working on the article regarding Carly Fiorina over the last month, as well as making a few changes and improvements; but, I've also realized that this article is still marked as "low importance in the WikiProject Conservatism. It also has no such rating for WikiProject Biography and WikiProject Women writers. Yet, I've realized that as of April 2015 (especially) it has been intimated that Firorina will campaign for a 2016 GOP Presidential nomination, although it does not seem to be officially confirmed; meanwhile, the page currently says that she "actively seeking," which seems to be an adequate description, since she appears to be making strong and more visible talking points in the media. Despite criticism and many past failures in electoral politics, Fiorina is considered a main public figure and, if in any regards, a Vice Presidential possibility by some people's standards, as well as having a career as a conservative pundit. It is my belief that Fiorina should have a higher ranking than "low." In most of these Misplaced Pages projects, I believe she should at least be at the next level, "Mid-importance." Ca.papavero (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Request assessment: ]

It is requested that a member assess the quality and/or importance of the following article:

Comments:

Re-confirm my request from the section above. A few things have since happened; but, altogether not yet resolved. Especially for this project on Conservatism. Thanks! Ca.papavero (talk) 21:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Categories: