This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Redleafjumper (talk | contribs) at 21:03, 28 May 2015 (→NFA Page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:03, 28 May 2015 by Redleafjumper (talk | contribs) (→NFA Page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is TaqPol's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 |
|
 Archives |
| No archives yet. |
Alf Healing
Hi Andrewying,
I saw your changes to the Alf Healing article - just a couple of things:
- He was an Australian Rules Footballer, not an Association Footballer
- The article is notable per WP:NAFL, and there have been numerous discussions relating to this as well, with a consensus to inclusion.
Based on those points I've reverted your edits - Let me know if you want to go over anything in more detail
Cheers Terlob (talk) 12:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks - apologies for not checking it further before tagging it. I will be adding a new (correct) stub tag. Please do let me know if the new tag I applied is incorrect. - Andrew Y talk 12:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- No worries - thanks for having a look over it. I don't usually add the tag - I just keep it on the talk page as most people looking at the page won't have much to add. Definitely no problem having it on there though! Thanks Terlob (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
I don't know how editing witing correct wikipedia guidelines can be seen as unconstructive. Warning without fully explaining is unconstructive. Please read the template documentation, MOS:CAPS and other guidelines and then discuss the edits. Thanks. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi User:208.81.212.222. The reason that I reverted the edit is because of WP:REMOVAL - you failed to explain fully the reason for removal of some of the content in the article. However, admittedly the revert of your other contents was not the most appropriate action and I apologise for that. — Andrew Y talk 19:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Associations are considered more than just passing work. Other formatting. This is fully explained when you know the template documentation and general editing guidelines. However, your edit explained nothing. Thanks for your apology. 208.81.212.222 (talk)
- "Associations are considered more than just passing work." is not a sufficient justification for removal of content w/r to instruments played. Nor is it immediately obvious that you are referring to the associated acts in your summary. It would have been a lot more helpful to note "inaccurate information" or "unsourced information" instead. — Andrew Y talk 19:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Associations are considered more than just passing work. Other formatting. This is fully explained when you know the template documentation and general editing guidelines. However, your edit explained nothing. Thanks for your apology. 208.81.212.222 (talk)
NFA Page
Andrew, the edits that I was replacing are not neutral. They are inflammatory and incorrect. My edits, which are accurate and verifiable, have been placed there to provide a much more balanced picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redleafjumper (talk • contribs) 20:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Redleafjumper, Your content is directly copied from the NFA website - this is not only copyright infringement but also represents a biased view. You are welcomed to bring this issue up to Misplaced Pages:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard if you so wish. — Andrew Y talk 20:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Andrew, I am fully empowered to make use of that content. I am also well aware of the content and what would be biased and what is correct and what is not. I am the Presdient of the NFA, and I have full permission to provide accurate NFA content and to remove inflammatory and inaccurate content from references to NFA. Thanks, Sheldon Clare, President and CEO NFA.