This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CrazynasBot (talk | contribs) at 08:28, 29 July 2006 (BOT- replacing bad image in {{sockpuppet}} subst'ed images). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:28, 29 July 2006 by CrazynasBot (talk | contribs) (BOT- replacing bad image in {{sockpuppet}} subst'ed images)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of ]. Please refer to evidence for evidence. See block log. |
]
I am not John Lott, nor does he tell me what to do. I think that the "sockpuppet" insult is simply thrown out at anyone who thinks that the POV of the Lambert clique's version of the John Lott article is biased. Actually I would have been satisfied to simply have a "disputed" header - but apparently the Lambert clique wants their POV to appear to be neutral and authoritative, which would seriously mislead the naive reader.
Just read through the history of this article - it is clearly in dispute!
Category: