This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TTTommy111 (talk | contribs) at 01:55, 12 June 2015 (→Peter Joseph: C). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:55, 12 June 2015 by TTTommy111 (talk | contribs) (→Peter Joseph: C)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hello
Please go to whatever page you are wondering about and hold the discussion there.
ArbCom
Just in case you missed it see here: . I shall be raising your multiple repeated violations of Misplaced Pages policies concerning TZM etc at ArbCom, where I shall call for you to be topic banned, and/or indefinitely blocked. You have been misusing Misplaced Pages as a platform for your personal vitriol and deranged conspiracy theories for far too long, and I see no reason why you should be permitted to continue. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Why are you flaming my user page? Calling another editor deranged is a personal attack. Earl King Jr. (talk) 11:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Both of you!! Stop quarreling! Andy: Your uses of terms such as "bat-shit crazy" and "deranged" are personal attacks. Even if you think that another editor is crazy, it is not permitted to suggest that he is crazy. I agree with you that Earl is not neutral, but that doesn't justify you flaming his user talk page. Andy: Read the boomerang essay. If you go to ArbCom, your own conduct will be scrutinized if ArbCom takes the case. ArbCom is likely to decline, either because the community has not dealt with the case in detail at WP:ANI, or because ArbCom has already put in discretionary sanctions for September 11 conspiracy theories, and, within a week or so, for American politics. Earl: You aren't neutral. You have a right to be antagonistic, but neutral point of view still does apply in Misplaced Pages. Earl: Just because talk page guidelines permit the blanking of your talk page doesn't mean it is a good idea. It is still deprecated. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Earl, Andy's remarks are over the top. For now I suggest letting Robert deal with him. Tom Harrison 17:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Peter Joseph
I saw you reverted some of my edits to the page for Peter Joseph. Thanks for the help about the references. I added back some of the information to the early life section, using only the documentary for the reference, not the personal website which I should have known better. After looking at the talk page, there seems to be quite a bit of back and forth on the page. Why is it so controversial? Seems like the issues would be easily resolved. --TTTommy111 (talk) 18:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- It seems that way Tommy but there are blocks of editors that are interested in Zeitgeist related material from the movement that feel obliged to edit things a certain way, like placing their faq's materials here instead of actual cited information that are reliable. and here . There are several more of the groups social networking sites that ask people to go to the various articles so keeping an eye on them can be a long drawn out process. Thanks and happy editing. Earl King Jr. (talk) 23:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- So I stepped on a landmine it seems. Thanks for the heads up. --TTTommy111 (talk) 01:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Post at AN
Your post at AN deleted another thread. Please fix that. Thanks Jytdog (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- meh, i fixedit. Jytdog (talk) 15:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, my mistake. Thank you. Earl King Jr. (talk) 23:54, 5 June 2015 (UTC)