This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mjroots (talk | contribs) at 03:27, 24 June 2015 (→SS Portmar: exp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:27, 24 June 2015 by Mjroots (talk | contribs) (→SS Portmar: exp)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Archive
- /archive one - July 2005 to January 2006
- /archive two - January 2006 to June 2006
- /archive three - June 2006 to May 2007
- /archive four - May 2007 to July 2008
- /archive five - August 2008 to June 2009
- /archive six - July 2009 to December 2010
- /archive seven - January 2010 to December 2012
- /archive eight - January 2012 to December 2014
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Collins-class submarine
- added a link pointing to Saab
- Collins-class submarine replacement project
- added a link pointing to Saab
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Gona Barracks and the six-inch gun reportedly from the HMAS Sydney
I have checked with the Qld Maritime Museum, who know nothing about this gun. They say the only six-inch gun they had came from the Cowan battery. So I have removed the reference to the QMM having the gun. But as they nothing of the gun in question, they could not help re the claim about coming from the HMAS Sydney. Not being a military history person, I don't really know where to go next to resolve this. Do you know where we might go? Kerry (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- The only Sydney I guns I know of are the ones mentioned at HMAS_Sydney_(1912)#Decommissioning_and_fate: 2 at Rottnest Island, one at Thursday Island. The sources I have do not mention any other used main guns from Sydney 1, and no artifacts of any size except a liferaft from Sydney 2. Seeing as the Queensland Heritage Register is the source cited to this questionable claim (and you've already disproven the claim that "its at the QMM" is the incorrect), asking the relevant authority (the Queensland Heritage Council?) for the origin of the statement is the best way forward. Either they can provide the origin of the claim (which could be used to strengthen the Gona Barracks and other articles), or they can't (and they remove the incorrect information from their database, improving what they provide to the community). Failing that, the Royal Australian Navy's Naval Heritage Centre may be able to help. -- saberwyn 11:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Directions Techniques Des Constructions Naval listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Directions Techniques Des Constructions Naval. Since you had some involvement with the Directions Techniques Des Constructions Naval redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. . signed:Donan Raven (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMAS Westralia (F95), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollandia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
HMAS Anzac (G90)?
This discussion may be of intrest to you as you moved Anzac to its current location.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Australian light destroyer project/Östergötland-class destroyer 'See also' sections (deleted).
Hi Saberwyn. I was planning to add more light destroyer types to the above sections, including those closer in time period to the respective programs. I am curious however, as to why you believe the DDLs and the Östergötlands have no connection what so ever. Not only were they both light destroyer types, but their original operational concepts were similar; in the case of the Östergötland class to help counter infiltration by Soviet underwater units including combat swimmers as well as to supplement existing destroyer classes such as the Halland and Öland. A major difference was that the DDL was intended to be the eventual basis for a family of naval vessels, while the goal of the Swedish Navy with the Östergötland class was for a cheap General Purpose combatant that could be built in large numbers. Both aims were to be ultimately frustrated; the DDL program by a combination of mission creep and political maneuvering while hopes for further Östergötlands were dashed by the, ah, interesting procurement politics in Sweden during the late 1950s and in particular the 1960s. This was despite the fact that the Östergötland class were arguably too austere.
On reflection, perhaps I should have called the section/s 'Ships of comparable era and/or role'. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- HMAS Derwent (DE 49) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to ASI
- Planned Australian offshore combatant vessel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mine warfare
- Søren Larsen (ship) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Baltic
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for HMAS Mildura
 | On 7 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMAS Mildura, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during the Japanese surrender of Hong Kong, one of HMAS Mildura's duties was overseeing the transfer of the local brewery from Japanese to Allied hands? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMAS Mildura. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 11 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Uranquinty page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Game of Thrones (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torrent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMAS Duchess (D154), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Precious again
scuttling
Thank you, editor working from a rich slab and library, for quality contributions to articles on ships and their destinies, such as scuttling, for gnomish cleanup with telling edit summaries and assessment, for adding a moving image which "summarises the entire article", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 837th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to HMS Ark Royal (91) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- related to major battles of the Royal Navy.<ref name=filmcrew/> ''Ark Royal'' lay in two sections: {{convert|20|m|ft} of the bow had separated from the rest of the ship. A large debris field, which
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
SS Portmar
I'd say there is enough material out there to write an article with. Ping me if you need assistance with The Times as a source. Mjroots (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Mjroots: Tried accessing the Times archive, but it told me I needed a subscription. -- saberwyn 02:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- No problem - I get free access via my library card. Mjroots (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)