This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mcginnly (talk | contribs) at 22:43, 31 July 2006 (→Eternal Equivox: grmr). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:43, 31 July 2006 by Mcginnly (talk | contribs) (→Eternal Equivox: grmr)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Ugg-ly!
Old messages are at
- User talk:Giano archive 1(2004)
- User talk:Giano archive 2 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 3 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 4 (2006)
- User talk:Giano archive 5 (2006)
 | Giano is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Please leave new messages at the foot of the page
Eternal Equivox
Don't let it bother you; with that level of vociferous support I'd be extremely surprised if anything came of it for either you or the others. Stepping back from it, I think old Fred Dibnah is trying to demonstrate what an even hand he has, by making all parties (EE anyway) feel that the enquiry isn't a fait accomplis at this stage. Motions for a vote of no-confidence are probably ill-advised at this stage when nothing has actually been determined, it will only serve to antagonise an Arbcom who probably believes he is acting in good faith. It just means you'll all have to just swallow your pride a bit at the affront of the Proposed Remedies. You shouldn't have to, but there you are......if it really pisses you off - get a steam engine:- "Steam engines don't answer back. You can belt them with a hammer and they say nowt." --Mcginnly | Natter 22:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)