Misplaced Pages

User talk:MehrdadFR/Archive 1

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:MehrdadFR

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darkwind (talk | contribs) at 05:33, 6 July 2015 (→July 2015: block). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:33, 6 July 2015 by Darkwind (talk | contribs) (→July 2015: block)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Irreligion in Iran

There are errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar with the reverted edits. Sources have been removed as well.--AnarchistFakest (talk) 03:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring. The verified sources are continuously being removed.--AnarchistFakest (talk) 04:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

I don't think you seem to understand what I'm trying to tell you. I have reliable sources that you keep removing. In doing so, you add your own sources that are irrelevant to the article and then cite them with grammatical and spelling errors. Now who's the one pushing their agenda?--AnarchistFakest (talk) 04:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Are you working for the Islamic Republic by any chance due to your persistent anti-irreligious edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnarchistFakest (talk • contribs) 04:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Irreligion in Iran. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 04:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.


Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. All Rows4 (talk) 21:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at United Against Nuclear Iran. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  —Darkwind (talk) 05:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)