This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pratyya Ghosh (talk | contribs) at 15:46, 21 August 2015 (→You've got mail!: again). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:46, 21 August 2015 by Pratyya Ghosh (talk | contribs) (→You've got mail!: again)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Jazz Stewart, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Jazz Stewart! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC) |
June 2015
Hello, I'm Krimuk90. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Shraddha Kapoor seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Shraddha Kapoor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- If you have certain issues with the article, discuss on the talk page and garner consensus to remove them. Until them, stop imposing your personal preference on what stays and what goes. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:46, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hahaha. LOL Jazz Stewart (talk) 05:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know I'm hilarious. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- please stop i dnt wanna wste my tym wiz u hre. Gtit!! Jazz Stewart (talk) 05:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- No problem. I understand you'd rather waste your time "wiz" destructive edits to Shraddha Kapoor and Alia Bhatt. "Gtit" to you too. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- please stop i dnt wanna wste my tym wiz u hre. Gtit!! Jazz Stewart (talk) 05:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know I'm hilarious. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hahaha. LOL Jazz Stewart (talk) 05:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:POINT
Not sure if you are removing ] to make a point, if you are don't. Ironically I agree that this was not a notable incident and you were right in removing. The key here is balance, when she makes the movie and it's noted she is singing and why it was important let's add it. To have a huge list of everything that person has done or how great each critic thinks is overkill in my opinion. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Deepika Padukone. Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Shahid Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Shraddha Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Discuss! Krimuk|90 (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Nt again U FUFF!!! OMG, SPARE ME.. really, i ddnt knw, thnx 4 infrmg me BTW, LOL, you (DMLS) Jazz Stewart (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jazz_Stewart reported by User:Hell in a Bucket (Result: ). Thank you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring at Shraddha Kapoor
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jazz Stewart reported by User:Hell in a Bucket (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Because you have a right to know
I just filed a sockpuppet case as I believe you might be a sock. The case is here. KoshVorlon We are all Kosh 18:10, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Is that true? OMG... Jazz Stewart (talk) 06:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at Shraddha Kapoor. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. You have been already warned and blocked for your controversial edits in Shraddha Kapoor page still you are repeating your mistakes. first talk and confirm your edits the add them. Prymshbmg (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello Jazz Stewart and welcome to Misplaced Pages! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page Shraddha Kapoor, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Misplaced Pages's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}}
below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Misplaced Pages.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~
); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Prymshbmg (talk) 10:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Jazz Stewart, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Shraddha Kapoor has not conformed to Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Prymshbmg (talk) 10:26, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Kapoor
Just out of curiosity this ] doesn't seem like it adds to the article as a matter of personal opinion it seems to be counterproductive. Why is this important to an encyclopedia article? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:37, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Misplaced Pages:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. 5 albert square (talk) 13:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- User:5 albert square, for the record I'm in the small category of established editors that doesn't care that they are templated. We have them for a reason so no harm no foul. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- @ Hell. Yeah, definitely you are an experienced editor. So that does not mean that you owned any particular page in Misplaced Pages. Making many edits or vandalizing errors that does not make you a diva at all. By the way, you don't own Shraddha Kapoor page. JazzStewart 13:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Never said I did, your additions are sub standard, usually the English is rough or you are adding gushing fan girl nonsense. If you notice there are several editors taking issue with your edits, WP:OWN isn't a get out of jail free card you'd do best to remember that. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Huh, if you really care about this page why don't you put it up to date. JazzStewart 13:33, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Because I mainly spend most of the time trying to keep the crap being put in out. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:39, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:POINT
I am going to ask if your recent section blanking is because of the sentence at the end of the lead I removed? Yes those should be sourced but ask yourself, what is she primarily known for? Acting or endorsing? The lead should be for the things she is most notable for. I want you to understand that my only objectives in this article is keep out NPOV gushing fancruft, unsourced additions and crystal violations. Articles in this genre are very high on the praise side and embellish things a lot. We don't want to do that for anything here. We are writing an encyclopedia, they aren't always fun they reports on facts, they shouldn't be embellished just presented neutrally. I'd suggest reading WP:POINT again, that's what the removal appeared like. I'd also suggest before you bandy warnings about WP:OWN you see things like ]. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- I will reply you later on. As i am doing an important thing in real life. Thank you. Please, just wait a little bit. JazzStewart 14:39, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- She is notable for acting not for endorsing. I mean, brands and NGOs used her star image to promote their causes. Same apply for award shows, they paid celebrities to perform or host in order to attract audience. Thing that make a celebrity notice or thing that they receive acclaims should be listed. I don't have any issues of her endorsing brands, but thing is that she is endorsing brands that does not bring her any where. See for Katrina Kaif, she get the opportunity to dazzle the Cannes Film Festival's red carpet as she is the spoke person of L'oreal. These things should be notable in a sense because walking in Cannes Film Festival is really a big thing in Bollywood. Not every actress get that opportunity no matter how famous they are. As well as appearing in a poll conducted by a prestigious magazine, which they gained recognition and privilege, as Aishwarya Rai featured in Forbe Magazine as the Most Influential celebrity in India. At the end of the day, you are getting it what i mean right. For Kapoor her singing career should really matter here, as she is singing chart buster songs produced by big banner of music companies. I mean her acting career overshadow her singing career. If an individual would do the same thing that she is doing, he would be famous. I mean, music directors approach her as a singer not as an actress. For that we should wait for Rock On 2, until she sings almost all the songs. At the end of the day, a celebrity can be noted for both singing and acting. Kapoor is not the first and the last also for exercising this. I mean stars like Jennifer Lopez, Shruti Hassan and Farhan Akhtar had already done these things. JazzStewart 15:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
ANI notice.
Please see ]. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, as a result of the discussion at ANI, you have agreed to be "adopted" and receive guidance regarding your edits to Misplaced Pages. Please see the list of adoptors and choose your adopter from there. You will need to contact your adopter via their talk page. Part of this will also be that you do not edit Shraddha Kapoor until your adopter feels that you are competent enough to do this. Thanks.--5 albert square (talk) 23:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- I haven't had any interactions with this editor but assuming the competency by their userpage User:Pratyya Ghosh might be an ideal candidate to do the adoption and might be more suited knowledge in the subject area even if only from a purely regional aspect and understand coverages an English only editor may not. Just my suggestion though. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- I also haven't had any interactions with the editor but I would agree.--5 albert square (talk) 00:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Have you decided on the mentor yet? User:5 albert square has asked that you work with that editor prior to editing the Kapoor page further. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, Jazz, part of the reason that I chose not to block you before was on the condition that you did not edit this article until your mentor decided that you were competent enough to do so. You agreed to this. I will now be watching your edits, if you edit in contravention to what you agreed to at ANI, I will have no option but to block you to prevent damage to the BLP.--5 albert square (talk) 04:22, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Jazz, we can see you have been active, you really should respond to this because just pretending the conversation never happened isn't going to help. A lot of good faith was extended to you, don't squander it. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I'm going to try one last time to get a response. Have you found someone to adopt you yet? I can see that you have been editing but so far you're going back to your previous behaviour which was to ignore talk page discussions. I extended a lot of good faith to you at ANI, whilst you haven't edited the article you did agree to adoption for some guidance and there's no evidence of that so far. If you do not get the guidance then I will have no option than to take further action against you.--5 albert square (talk) 01:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
User:5 albert square, if you see ] JS has at least went through the motion of starting the process. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:23, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah definitely for your kind information Hell and you had decided that i should get adopted. As for my concern i think that i had enough potential to edit Misplaced Pages so far. As usual i had readily agreed whatever you and Hell said, as i believe that you guys are experience editors, and as for adoption are concern i had already appealed for a user here ] and had left a message to another user. ]. JazzStewart 05:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, please fix your email, I can't send you email as it is not authenticated. Also see my reply at my talkpage. --Pratyya 12:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah sure. JazzStewart 13:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Jazz for following through. I wish you the best, drop me a line if you have any questions. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- @ Hell, Yeah sure, I will why not. JazzStewart 14:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Jazz for following through. I wish you the best, drop me a line if you have any questions. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah sure. JazzStewart 13:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Hello, Jazz Stewart. Please check your email; you've got mail!Message added 14:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Pratyya 14:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Again. --Pratyya 15:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)