This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mudwater (talk | contribs) at 13:42, 19 September 2015 (Proceeding, or not, with the GA review.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:42, 19 September 2015 by Mudwater (talk | contribs) (Proceeding, or not, with the GA review.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Darknipples, Mudwater: It is hard for me to review this while it undergoes heavy changes. Any end in sight? Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Zwerg Nase: As I've explained on the talk page -- see my posts there, and in the talk page archives, for a full explanation -- having an article called "Gun show loophole" violates the Misplaced Pages NPOV policy. A better title would be "Background checks for firearm sales in the United States". There's been a lot of discussion about this issue, but as far as I can tell there's not going to be a consensus about it. At the current time I'm not planning to say much more about this. As far as the article itself, I have made some edits to it, but not that many. So for my part, I'd say go ahead with the GA review. — Mudwater 13:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)