This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gourami Watcher (talk | contribs) at 00:33, 24 September 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:33, 24 September 2015 by Gourami Watcher (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Little Miss Nobody (American murder victim)
- Little Miss Nobody (American murder victim) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Torso found in 1960 in state of advanced decomposition and unable to be identified. No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources beyond initial 1960 news article. Google search and Google news search return no relevant links.
Other Unidentified Persons Database reference contains no details that meet WP:GNG. Third linked ref is independent, non-law enforcement volunteer site which does not meet WP:RS.
Victim was toddler or young child when murdered and at time of murder was not notable for anything else. WP:NOTNEWS. AldezD (talk) 23:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - NOTNEWS does not apply here. Clearly notable. Per WP:GNG and WP:CRIME. Better sourcing could be an option though. --BabbaQ (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: This nomination is spiteful and frivolous. This article was patrolled when it was created and found to be acceptable for Misplaced Pages. AldezD has done some good work on the wiki but at times he gives the impression of being on a personal crusade, imposing his views. I would hesitate to call him a troll but... Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I recently uncovered several more resources giving information for the victim and planned to update it when I got the chance. I feel the case meets sourcing requirements as the presence of primary and secondary currently are used in the article and more will soon be added.The Doe Network does have law enforcement background and even has members that are liaisons/officers of law enforcement facilities. This AFD seems rushed. No need to get too carried away. --GouramiWatcher 00:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Reformat to event article She wasn't even an entire corpse, just a torso. At least as far as anyone here knows. Of course, she used to be a person, but nothing she did during that time was worth a mention, let alone significant coverage. Jane Doe's body parts turn up all the time, and while I appreciate the clever nickname separating her from the rest, that nickname doesn't help her notability case a bit. See nobody for details. The hubbub got some attention, but she did essentially nothing. Not a real biography. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:29, September 24, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Where exactly is it stated that only the torso of the victim was found? As far as I've read, it was determined that the child had teeth that were well-cared for and that she had painted her toenails. NAMUS profile states "all parts recovered." --GouramiWatcher 00:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)