Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/NoCal100 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kingsindian (talk | contribs) at 15:46, 12 October 2015 (→06 October 2015: cmt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:46, 12 October 2015 by Kingsindian (talk | contribs) (→06 October 2015: cmt)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

NoCal100

NoCal100 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/NoCal100/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/NoCal100.



06 October 2015

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


Looks like this user has been suspected of being NoCal100 earlier but was inconclusive. I am resubmitting this. Typical NoCal behaviour here, very reminiscient of All Rows4 here: long dormant account reactivated for taking sides with a new user against old editors on the "other side", like Nishidani and Zero. Earlier activity was similar, targeting Pluto2012's edits here. As an aside, HJ Mitchell, since the Brad Dyer case is dragging on, may I also suggest that this user be CU'd against them, in addition to the confirmed sock All Rows4? The behaviour is very similar to here. Kingsindian ♝♚ 21:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I just want to add that the user being "supported" here was banned as a sockpuppet - (I have my doubts about whether they are really a sockpuppet) - but the behaviour of FFF is very similar to the All Rows4 sock who was supporting a sock of Wlglunight93. That may not mean much, since so many editors in this area are socks, but something to keep in mind. Kingsindian ♝♚ 15:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Firkin Flying Fox is  Inconclusive due to the use of open proxy (and satellite) services. The user agent is different to two other socks I checked though. Moving to open queue for behavioural analysis. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories: