Scholars for 9/11 Truth - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed user FoctULjDYf (talk | contribs) at 03:04, 10 August 2006 (rv edit in violation of WP policy on WP:AUTO, WP:NPOV. This is your third revert). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:04, 10 August 2006 by Renamed user FoctULjDYf (talk | contribs) (rv edit in violation of WP policy on WP:AUTO, WP:NPOV. This is your third revert)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

File:S911t.JPG

Scholars for 9/11 Truth ("S9/11T") is a group of about 300 people, including faculty, students, and scholars who question the mainstream media and government account of the September 11, 2001 attacks. The group was founded on December 15, 2005.

Overview

The group believes that the investigations by FEMA and NIST regarding the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings are inadequate, and that crucial facts and questions pertaining to the attacks have been ignored by senior government officials. These questions include:

What caused building #7 of the World Trade Center to collapse?
How did all three WTC buildings collapse close to the speed of which they would have collapsed had there been no structural stability at all?
What happened to the significant core column structure during the collapse?
What is the source of molten metal which was observed pooling in the rubble?

The group is petitioning Congress for access to the remaining evidence in order for scientific research to be carried out to determine whether or not explosives were utilized to bring down the WTC buildings. One of their beliefs is that thermite, which can be used to weld or cut metal, played a role in causing the collapse of the towers. They claim this possible presence of thermite throws the entire official government explanation of the collapse into question.,

According to the S9/11T website, "The members of S9/11T are encouraged to take an active role by devoting themselves to reporting the results of research on 9/11 to the nation and the world by means of lectures, articles, and other venues."

Members

Those included in this society are:

Kevin Barrett: academic and associate lecturer at the University of Wisconsin.,,
Robert M. Bowman: Former director of the US Advanced Space Programs Development in the Carter and Ford administrations, former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. Bowman also holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, and is currently attempting to run for Congress in Florida.,,
James H. Fetzer: McKnight Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth and co-chair of S9/11T. ,
David Ray Griffin: Professor of philosophy of religion and theology emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology.
Steven E. Jones: Professor of physics, Brigham Young University, co-chair of S9/11T, and an editor of its forthcoming publication, Journal for 9/11 Studies.
Wayne Madsen: investigative journalist, author, and syndicated columnist.
John McMurtry: FRSC, moral philosopher, ethicist, and author of six books on public policy issues, who works at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada.
Morgan Reynolds: Texas A&M University Professor of Economics Emeritus, and former Chief Economist for the United States Department of Labor, former Director of the Criminal Justice Center.,
Webster G. Tarpley, author of George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992) and 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA (2005-6), historian and terrorism expert.
Andreas von Bülow: former state-secretary in the German Defense Ministry, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years.

History

National 9/11 Debate

According to an S9/11T press release, a debate was proposed on the subject of 9/11. The debate would be between two seven-member teams: a "civilian" team and a "government" team. The government team would defend the official story of 9/11, while the civilian team would challenge it. The event was scheduled for September 16, 2006 in North Charleston, South Carolina.

This event was proposed by members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who have announced that their civilian team would consist of Philip J. Berg, Steven E. Jones, James H. Fetzer, David Ray Griffin, George Nelson, Morgan Reynolds, and Judy Wood.

According to the Scholars website, invitations were extended to the 9/11 commission members, NIST investigators, FEMA investigators, engineering organizations, and security providers.

"Reclaiming Our Future" conference

In July 2006, many members of the group met in Chicago, Illinois, for a conference on 9/11 theories, which was covered by some international media.

Conclusions

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (Learn how and when to remove this message)

According to the Scholars' website, their conclusions are based on the results of their own scientific and political research. They suggest that the official version of events on September 11, 2001 is being used to manipulate the American people for political purposes, to undermine the Constitution, launch illegal wars, and subject the people to virtually unrestricted surveillance.

Criticism

Some express concern that individual members of the scholars group and its website are promoting theories or speculation not shared by all members of the scholars group nor the 9/11 Truth Movement (such as the idea that military drone planes were used in the attacks, or that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon) and may thus discredit the movement ,, . Other critics, such as Daryl Bradford Smith, believe that members of the Scholars group use 'deliberate deception' by promoting theories which involve hydrogen bombs and links to sites promoting holographic blue sceen planes.

Although the 'Resources' page on the scholars' website states, "We do not necessarily endorse or concur with conclusions or opinions expressed here, but we think that they provide suggestive and stimulating resources for further contemplation," the website provides neither information nor links to both sides of the Pentagon issue, which many regard as extremely divisive within the movement. By only citing the theory that American Airlines Flight 77 could not have crashed at the Pentagon, with no counter argument, the Scholars site reflects neither the diversity within the scholars nor the 9/11 truth movement itself.

They also point to the fact there are no structural engineers listed as members of the group, and the engineers involved with the scholars have little relevant work with the appropriate disciplines, for example Judy Wood, who has focused her work on the stresses of dentistry.

Media coverage and works

Televised symposiums:

25 June 2006 — 9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda Symposium in L.A. Sheraton Hotel - discussion panel then rebroadcasted in July and August prime time on main CSPAN channel. Featured speakers Webster Tarpley, Steven Jones, Bob Bowman, James Fetzer, and Alex Jones (stream & download media link)

Television Interviews:

22 June 2006 — James H. Fetzer, guest on Fox News Channel's Hannity and Colmes (podcast, YouTube )

Radio Interviews:

14 June 2006 — Kevin Ryan on "Lies About the World Trade Center by NIST and Underwriters Laboratory" Guns & Butter/KPFA 94.1 (link)
23 February – 24 February 2006 — James H. Fetzer with David Ray Griffin and Morgan Reynolds on Coast to Coast AM radio (link)
25 February 2006 — James H. Fetzer "An Inside Job" (podcast)
15 February 2006 — James H. Fetzer "Radioactive Radio" (link)

Lectures:

15 March 2006 — Kevin Ryan: "A 9/11 Whistleblower Examines the Official Conspiracy Theory"
30 March 2006 — David Ray Griffin "9/11: The Myth & the Reality"
31 March 2006 — Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D., and Don Paul, Author "Critical Analysis: 9/11"
2 June – 4 June 2006 — Steven E. Jones "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future”

Papers: Scholars for 9/11 Truth describes these papers as "peer-reviewed", although they have not been published in any scientific journal.

“Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
“Thinking about "Conspiracy Theories": 9/11 and JFK” by James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

Books

Greenwald, Glenn (Constitutional law attorney).How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Values from a President Run Amok. Working Assets Publishing, 2006, 146 p.

Griffin, Dr. David Ray. The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11.Olive Branch Press, Northampton, MA, 2004.

Griffin, Dr. David Ray. The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions.Olive Branch Press, Northampton, MA, 2004.

Marrs, Jim (journalist). Inside Job.Origin Press, 2004. 240 p.

Ruppert, Michael C. (former Los Angeles Police Department narcotics investigator). Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil. New Society Publishers, 2004. 696 p.

Smith, Dr. J.W. Why? The Deeper History Behind the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks on America, 3rd ed., The Institute for Economic Democracy, Sun City, AZ, 2005.

Snow, Dr. Nancy. Information War: American Propaganda, Free Speech, and Opinion Control Since 9/11. Seven Stories Press, 2003

Zarembka, Dr. Paul., ed.The Hidden History of 9-11-2001 (Vol. 23 of Research in Political Economy),Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006.
- Including: David Ray Griffin, “The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True”, pp 79–122,

References

External links

Categories: