Misplaced Pages

User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) at 21:57, 25 October 2015 (A cookie for you!: new WikiLove message). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:57, 25 October 2015 by Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) (A cookie for you!: new WikiLove message)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

There is no Cabal

Welcome! Feel free to leave a message at the bottom, and I'll get back to you. If you're angry and stressed, try listening to this while composing your comment.

vn-6This user talk page has been vandalized 6 times.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16



This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.
If you feel that I have made a mistake of any kind, please let me know. I do make mistakes, and I am happy to talk it out. Uncivil comments will end up in my "Fun Insult Userboxes" section. GAB
Due to increased obligations, my daily Wikitime will be curtailed for the foreseeable future. GAB

Generalizations to be avoided

In General, is not the idea that all "GeneralizationsAreBad" something of an over-generalization? For without simple-minded generalizations, most of the press go out-of-business. That again, perhaps it is not such a bad idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.248.186 (talk) 19:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

My name is meant to be a pun; still, I think that generalizations should be used sparingly, and should always be accompanied by caveats. GAB 22:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
92.20.248.186, since his userpage states it's meant to be a joke, I wouldn't put much into it. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 21:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

"After World War II, Boss was fined for his support of Nazism and was not allowed to vote"

Wait a God damn minute! The post-war German government strongly condemned the policies of Nazi Germany, but practiced the same laws on their enemies? The irony is so thick it makes me furious, furious I tell you! Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 21:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm afraid I am not an expert on post-war German politics and the Denazification process, I'm sorry. :( But I can see the conflict. GAB 22:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

High Fantasy

Hello GAB Could you please remove the critics section from High Fantasy? The other RPG sections do not have a critics section to define their work. Your sections takes up more space than anything relevant about the game or it's author. Could you imagine a critics section on D&D. I remember all the articles and law suits claiming playing the game leads to death and murder. I could help you find more relevant material if you need help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.6.53.53 (talk) 23:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for performing vandal patrol on my talk page - I never even saw them come and go! Scr★pIron 21:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! Least I could do, really. GAB 22:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

More Vandalism

The same people trying to vandalise the Hearts of Iron 4 article moved to another one, the https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Paradox_Interactive I'd also recommend to revert to a version made before 23/24 of october and locking it down.

143.107.252.207 (talk) 22:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your vigilance. I'm reverting the vandalism and requesting blocks. GAB 22:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
No problem. They will probably try another page of games made by Paradox Interactive and classified as Grand Strategy (like the Europa Universalis 4 page), I will try to keep an eye on it. 143.107.252.207 (talk) 22:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Sounds good. Don't hesitate to contact me, or go to WP:RFPP or WP:AIV. GAB 22:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hurricane Patricia (disambiguation page)

Can you please stop reverting my edits on Hurricane Patricia (disambiguation), many reliable sources are already given in the main article so there is no need to cite the same sources again. Disambiguation pages usually do not need sources, most disambiguation pages here on Misplaced Pages don't need to repeat the sources that are already listed in the more detailed article. And if you check on many disambiguation pages for hurricane names you will find the same unsourced material, but that does not mean that it is not valid, or that it has not been previously sourced on each main article. 190.56.62.67 (talk) 20:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Alright. Sorry for the trouble. GAB 21:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

My Page

That page is my page i will do whatever i want what the heck bothers you and who are u to delete my page what will happen if i delete your page so just be quite dont do anything If you want i can now itself talk to mahesh i have property worth more than 50000 crores if you want type Azim Premji he is my grandfather. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.118.107.86 (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

User page for CSD

Hello: why did you reinstall the user page which contained description of a movie called Revolver (User:Vallabh Nagampalli)? It is complete fiction, therefore my CSD. As well, it is not material for a proper talk page. So food for a discussion. Therefore I reinstalled my request. Cheers,Super48paul (talk) 17:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

High Fantasy

GAB, You are confusing real edits with inexperienced editors. You put Don Turnbull's review of High Fantasy on your High Fantasy web page. Don was a competitor of High Fantasy. He worked for TSR and wrote competitive games, and additional materials for TSR. He worked hard to introduce D&D to the UK. In his critique he even explains his position as only a comparison to his beloved AD&D. You should not include competitor's reviews on the introductory web page. Particularly when it is such an outlier to the other reviewers. It is especially bad when you give it such a prominent position on your page.HigherOrder (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for page-stalking my talk page. I appreciate it! Keep up the good work! Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 21:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)