Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kwame Nkrumah

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kwame Nkrumah (talk | contribs) at 23:03, 11 August 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:03, 11 August 2006 by Kwame Nkrumah (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kwame Nkrumah (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was simply explaining why I am not answering to his posts. If you think this is disruption... (is it 6 or 3 hours?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was simply explaining why I am not answering to his posts. If you think this is disruption... (is it 6 or 3 hours? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was simply explaining why I am not answering to his posts. If you think this is disruption... (is it 6 or 3 hours? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was simply explaining why I am not answering to his posts. If you think this is disruption... (is it 6 or 3 hours? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}


Personal attacks

Personal attacks on other wikipedians are unacceptable. Please refrain from such. --Doc 21:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Please don't remove admin warnings from your talkpage either. --Doc 21:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Right, I'm asking you nicely to remove that from your user page. Perhaps it isn't a personal attack, but it is hardly WP:CIVIL and it isn't helping people try to co-operate together on this project. If you have a dispute with another user either a) ignore them b) discuss with them c) use the official dispute proceedures what you are doing now looks to be a lot like trolling. --Doc 21:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
If it is allowed, you can't enforce you request, am I wrong? ( I am trying to understand)--Kwame Nkrumah 21:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
It's more of an issue of general decency and civility towards other editors. It certainly doesn't promote a positive editing environment to have such a section on your user page, for example. Cowman109 22:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your answer. However, I shall wait for Doc's one, before giving my opinion on the matter.--Kwame Nkrumah 22:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


What you have on your userpage is disruptive and provokative. Remove it, or I will have to conclude that you intend to be disruptive. For that I will block you. It may well be that another user is engaging in personal attacks (I'll investigate that) but it does not excuse you being disruptive. --Doc 22:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I thanked you for removing it, now you push it by replacing it with more disruption. I can only conclude that you are going to waste your evening (and mine) with more lawyering and light trolling. Well, probably nothing is to be gained by your editing for the next few hours, so I'm blocking you for 6 hours. When you come back - EDIT ARTICLES - and stop the time wasting nonsense. You were warned. --Doc 22:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Category: