Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kwame Nkrumah

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bishonen (talk | contribs) at 03:44, 12 August 2006 (Your post on WP:ANI). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:44, 12 August 2006 by Bishonen (talk | contribs) (Your post on WP:ANI)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kwame Nkrumah (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was simply explaining why I am not answering to his posts. If you think this is disruption... (is it 6 or 3 hours?)

Decline reason:

Time to step back from this and take a break


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Personal attacks

Personal attacks on other wikipedians are unacceptable. Please refrain from such. --Doc 21:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Please don't remove admin warnings from your talkpage either. --Doc 21:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Right, I'm asking you nicely to remove that from your user page. Perhaps it isn't a personal attack, but it is hardly WP:CIVIL and it isn't helping people try to co-operate together on this project. If you have a dispute with another user either a) ignore them b) discuss with them c) use the official dispute proceedures what you are doing now looks to be a lot like trolling. --Doc 21:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
If it is allowed, you can't enforce you request, am I wrong? ( I am trying to understand)--Kwame Nkrumah 21:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
It's more of an issue of general decency and civility towards other editors. It certainly doesn't promote a positive editing environment to have such a section on your user page, for example. Cowman109 22:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your answer. However, I shall wait for Doc's one, before giving my opinion on the matter.--Kwame Nkrumah 22:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


What you have on your userpage is disruptive and provokative. Remove it, or I will have to conclude that you intend to be disruptive. For that I will block you. It may well be that another user is engaging in personal attacks (I'll investigate that) but it does not excuse you being disruptive. --Doc 22:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I thanked you for removing it, now you push it by replacing it with more disruption. I can only conclude that you are going to waste your evening (and mine) with more lawyering and light trolling. Well, probably nothing is to be gained by your editing for the next few hours, so I'm blocking you for 6 hours 3hours. When you come back - EDIT ARTICLES - and stop the time wasting nonsense. You were warned. --Doc 22:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I really do not understand you. I removed a text you did not like because you said it was a provocation. I put a text in which I explained why I am not answering to Palffy in Template talk:Infobox National football team and Talk:FC Chernomorets Odessa (admins told us to stay apart) and you block me? The funny part is that all this started because I quarrelled with an editor that has been provoking and attacking me the whole time (you told me you would have been investigating, you should have found his attacks by now), and I get scolded because I did not EDIT ARTICLES?--Kwame Nkrumah 23:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Your initial text was inappropriate, we expect editors to behave in a mature and constructive manner. You seem to have misunderstood the point, singling out another editor based on a disagreement is not constructive and is not something which should be emblazoned on your userpage (See WP:USER for details on user pages). This is a fairly short block and I suggest you use it to consider if there isn't a better way to deal with your issues with the other editor. --pgk 23:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
What I do not understand is, if I am told I cannot interact with another user, why I am blocked when I write this on my page? And apart this, writing I won't answer to someone is a good reason for a three hours block? --Kwame Nkrumah 23:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Furthermore, I do not understand the relationship between this edit and the comment to the three-hours punishment ("disruption, trolling and personal attacks")--Kwame Nkrumah 23:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


See what your userpage is not, it is not merely your page to do with as you please. --pgk 00:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I read the link and still don't see what's wrong with my edit. However...--Kwame Nkrumah 00:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
If you genuinely don't understand where you are going wrong, then go to WP:WELCOME and try to get an understanding of what wikipedia is about. If you still can't see what's wrong, then I doubt that wikipedia is really for you. --Doc 00:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
You told me not to mess with this guy. I wrote "I'm not messing with this guy". You block me for "disruption, trolling and personal attacks". Where is the disruption? When I trolled? Above all, when I personally attacked anyone?--Kwame Nkrumah 00:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Your post on WP:ANI

I replied here. Bishonen | talk 03:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC).