Misplaced Pages

Talk:E-liquid

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) at 04:48, 24 November 2015 (Purpose of this Page, and address SEED material from "Construction of Electronic Cigarettes": {{copied}} template belongs at the top of the talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:48, 24 November 2015 by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) (Purpose of this Page, and address SEED material from "Construction of Electronic Cigarettes": {{copied}} template belongs at the top of the talk page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

E-Liquid

E-Liquid is its own entry and definition. It is a common term. It is an element of an Electronic Cigarette. E-Liquid should not redirect to Electronic Cigarettes Mystery Wolff (talk) 13:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Redundant page

I think this page is a cut and paste of a section in another article. See Construction_of_electronic_cigarettes#E-liquid. QuackGuru (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

If the page is not expanded soon I think it would be best to redirect. I think after it is expanded then there can be a separate page. QuackGuru (talk) 05:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome to contribute content to improve the page. Your concerns have been addressed including the addition of the top banner. Thank you Mystery Wolff (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Purpose of this Page, and address SEED material from "Construction of Electronic Cigarettes"

1. The intent of this page is to be the larger more expansive Misplaced Pages entry for all things E-Liquid.

2. Before this page pointed just to Electronic Cigarettes

3. E-Liquid is a multi-billion dollar industry and deserves its own entry. It is sold by itself without any hardware. It is its own thing.

4. The content here was seeded by copying the content by the Wiki Editors of https://en.wikipedia.org/Construction_of_electronic_cigarettes#E-liquid Those editors contributions to the source I recognized here.

5. The intent is to build out this page, to become the main E-Liquid page.

6. I received feedback from Doug Weller on attribution, and everything should be good to go. Mystery Wolff (talk) 06:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please read this: It appears that this page was copied or moved text from Construction of electronic cigarettes into this page. Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that we provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template at the top of the talk page of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation for duplication. We can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. QuackGuru (talk) 04:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Text is sourced

"A user will usually obtain 300 to 500 puffs per mL of liquid."

  1. Hildick-Smith, Gordon J.; Pesko, Michael F.; Shearer, Lee; Hughes, Jenna M.; Chang, Jane; Loughlin, Gerald M.; Ipp, Lisa S. (2015). "A Practitioner's Guide to Electronic Cigarettes in the Adolescent Population". Journal of Adolescent Health. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.07.020. ISSN 1054-139X. PMID 26422289.

See "A typical user will get 300-500 puffs per mL of fluid." QuackGuru (talk) 01:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Sourced text replaced with original research?

These changes appear to be original research. QuackGuru (talk) 04:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)