Misplaced Pages

User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheTimesAreAChanging (talk | contribs) at 17:56, 27 November 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:56, 27 November 2015 by TheTimesAreAChanging (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

The Sega Article

Before you revert the edits on the Sega Article, present me good arguments why the article was good the way it was before. You still haven't responded to my points responding to your concerns. Talk:Sega#Proposed mass deletion

Talkback

Hello, TheTimesAreAChanging. You have new messages at Talk:Khmer_Rouge#Revert.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jumping Flash!

Hi, I'm not sure if you have the time or would be willing but I've requested a peer review for Jumping Flash!, which can be found here. It's improved since the FAC last year, and I've removed most of the content that didn't follow the sources. New additions have also been found and added to the article, which I will slowly work on once the peer review has gathered more comments. I know you're good with sources, so any small spotchecking would be a great help and a potential pain-reliever for its second FAC. Anything would be welcome. Regards JAGUAR  23:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

I don't think I have the time.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
No worries. JAGUAR  13:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice - American politics

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 --slakr 13:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Your scrutiny, precision, and community service are more than admirable. I salute your editing and enjoy your tendency to incorrigibility, which brightens up Misplaced Pages no end. Cheers! YeOldeGentleman (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Iraq War

Partly so I can understand where you are coming from, which books do you recommend on Iraq War? Just a few, and obviously only if you have the time and can be bothered. --YeOldeGentleman (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

I'd be lying if I said I considered myself an expert on the topic, or that most of what I know about Iraq comes from books (though I did consult Charles R. H. Tripp's History of Iraq). To understand Bush's position, Decision Points is as good a resource as any as far as I'm concerned. Before I realized the Bush foreign policy was insanely far to the Left, I read a lot of Christopher Hitchens.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Before I realized the Bush foreign policy was insanely far to the Left…
Ha ha ha! You are amusing, I'll give you that! Best wishes etc. --YeOldeGentleman (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)