Talk:Belle Knox - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DreamGuy (talk | contribs) at 16:04, 6 December 2015 (→Amanda Knox: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:04, 6 December 2015 by DreamGuy (talk | contribs) (→Amanda Knox: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 September 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on March 7 2014. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

Archive 1 (Start - March 19 2014)

Belle Knox

No discussion on Belle Knox and yet it has been nominated for deletion 2 times by haters?--150.216.254.207 (talk) 00:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Please assume good faith! The problem is that first, the article was initially deleted and the talk history from that first version does not show up on the current talk page. You can see it in the talk page history and I'll see if I can get it archived somehow. As far as the nominations go, the first nomination came when the story had just broken and there were concerns that everything fell under WP:BLP1E. In a nutshell, that policy is concerned with the idea that someone might have gained coverage for something that is fleeting and would ultimately be forgotten in a few weeks or so. Daniel Morgan Perry and the Ikea Monkey are excellent examples of things that gained quite a bit of coverage at first but had no lasting notability and did not gain any real further coverage. When the page was re-created a little bit ago, it didn't have that much coverage or content compared to the last version and given the discussion at the last AfD, it's reasonable to be concerned over lasting notability and taking the article back to AfD was the right thing to do in this instance. While Knox's reasons for coverage are contentious for obvious reasons, people nominating her article for deletion does not automatically mean that they are "haters". Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

I've made an archive of the contents and you can view it via the box above. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:00, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

SVU episode

http://uproxx.com/tv/2014/10/whats-on-tonight-svu-does-its-duke-porn-star-episode/ Gaijin42 (talk) 01:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

I was thinking about how to properly include this and I think a simple mention using the XOJane article she wrote might be easiest under the heading of "Advocacy",

http://www.xojane.com/it-happened-to-me/belle-knox-evie-barnes-law-and-order-svu. Yes, its a primary source, but it does describe the producers intentions for the episode to mirror Knox's situation. --SChotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 18:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Since the episode mirrors essentially the early porn and outing story, I was thinking a sentence or so in the Belle_Knox#Outing_and_harassment might be appropriate.

One important BLP detail in that xojane story is Knox saying she was raped (although unless I missed it, the story does not say when or under what circumstances, so I don't know if it was earlier in her life, or during her porn career). Gaijin42 (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, if there is adequate sourcing that is much more relevant than the SVU pop culture reference. I reduced the SVU coverage to one sentence as suggested above; I think more than that would be unnecessary. VQuakr (talk) 06:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Parents' names

I have removed the parents' names. While we had a source for them, they do not significantly improve our readers' understanding of Knox, are not themselves notable, and should have the benefit of a presumption of privacy. Huon (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Seems reasonable. VQuakr (talk) 02:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Twitter username @belle_knox no longer hers

It now has only a single tweet, which apparently advertises a cam site. 71.183.132.20 (talk) 02:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Before her website closed she mentioned she deleted all the social media accounts. From the archive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.81.147.8 (talk) 12:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Amanda Knox

An IP editor removed mention that she was exonerated without comment. We should not let people reading this assume she really did it. The wording is up to date, but guiltism when she isn't guilty is unacceptable. I restored the wording as it was months ago. DreamGuy (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Categories: