This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ollie231213 (talk | contribs) at 18:03, 7 December 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:03, 7 December 2015 by Ollie231213 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)List of Australian supercentenarians
- List of Australian supercentenarians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This list covers most of the people on List of supercentenarians from Oceania where the country of everyone is already noted. It is the only county specific breakout of the Oceania group, a list that is not so long it requires breaking out. Delete, leaving the title as a redirect to the Oceania article. This will reduce the maintenance required and the chances of error or variation. Legacypac (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
The article List of supercentenarians from Oceania should be deleted, not this one. Australia is a country so deserves it's own article. Oceania is not a country so should be deleted as they do not warrant a separate entry in Misplaced Pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crveni5 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Except Australia and Oceania aren't the same thing, so this argument doesn't really work. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)