Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mouse001

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mouse001 (talk | contribs) at 21:23, 30 December 2015 (Faulty warning. Not disruptive editing.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:23, 30 December 2015 by Mouse001 (talk | contribs) (Faulty warning. Not disruptive editing.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User Page

Greetings, If you add some characters to your User Page, your alias will turn from red to blue.CFredkin (talk) 16:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Please note an attempt to bar me,Nocturnalnow, from ALL U.S. political articles is underway

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is at it again; this time there is a much more aggressive posture aimed at entirely shutting down my edits. Please note the "Result" suggestion at the bottom of the discussion.Your comment regarding this banning attempt would be greatly appreciated. Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Nocturnalnow Ban Attempt Nocturnalnow (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Commented :) Good luck.--Mouse001 (talk) 03:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Reliable sources, etc.

Re this edit on Ron Paul - There were three major problems with your additions, hence my revert:

  • This post on a Wordpress opinion blog, to which you linked, is not a reliable source. See Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources.
  • The new header you added ("Facing Election Fraud at State Conventions") and accompanying text ("There are numerous documented cases of election fraud that occurred at the state conventions during Paul's 2012 presidential run") are not supported by the cited sources and lend a distinctly POV color to the article. The Reuters opinion piece you cite is an opinion piece, not straight news, and more importantly it never uses the word "fraud" (that's a strong word and one that we must be extremely careful about using). The third source you cite - the Democracy Now transcript - also never uses the word fraud.

So that's why I reverted your edits. Neutrality 06:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom

Hello, I was limited by the template to including 7 Users but you can still make a comment at this venue https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_American_politics_2 Nocturnalnow (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)