Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by My very best wishes (talk | contribs) at 20:33, 8 January 2016 (→3RR violation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I don't  think that your information  are completely  right . When editing an article please make sure you're  telling the full story not  one-sided-story

I make edits to existing articles without any pretence to tell "full story". Nobody knows the "full story" even about himself. Apparently, YOU do not even seem to know your name.Axxxion (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

As to "your information are completely right", your grammar is definitely not right. And of course, i do not use any of "my information": i simply do not have any. Try to understand first WHAT exactly you are unhappy about. And then write here comprehensibly. And do not forget to sign too!Axxxion (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Syrian Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary samctions

Just a note to alert you that 2015 San Bernardino shooting is under discretionary sanctions, with a WP:1RR limit: All articles related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed, are placed under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume an edit is related and so is a revert. - Cwobeel (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Cold War II#Move portions to other pages?

Did you read the closing rationale? We should limit the article's scope to avoid original research from now on. --George Ho (talk) 23:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why you used simile unless it's sarcasm. Anyway, a source must explicitly mention "Cold War II" or related names, not narrowly Russia–US. --George Ho (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Which makes me wonder if all the sources in the Cold War article explicitly mention "Cold War". Just sarcasm. On a more serious note, talking of terrorism, off-topic, i just meant that human nature tends to find its way through attempts to suppress it. Once you make an outright war look bad or even illegal, you get the much worse situation that we now have, where you cannot stop war because officially there is no war (who declared war in Syria?). Now each state in addition to an official army has another unofficial army of terrorists that do war by stealth. For war is the ultimate way to solve objective conflict in the human development such as overpopulation, lack of resources, poverty, pursuit of happiness and power, etc. Plus we have a slew of "security services" whose actual pursuit is to create maximum insecurity by stealth to maximise their share of a budget pie and political clout.Axxxion (talk) 20:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Just abide to consensus and closing rationale, okay? Also, cooperate with Hollth; I think he's done a better job moving portions than I can. If you oppose the rationale, talk to the closer, or create a newer discussion. --George Ho (talk) 20:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please note that I had to revision-delete your summary to this edit which contained a gross BLP violation. Please do not do it again. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Rus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

3RR violation

You just made a 3RR violation (4 reverts in less than 24 hours) on page Madaya, Syria. Also note that your edits on this page are covered by community sanctions on Syrian war, according to which only one revert allowed during 24 hours. My very best wishes (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

But why is the article open to anonymous and newly registered users? Which makes it an easy prey for propaganda battles.Axxxion (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

If you think that article should be semi-protected because of vandalism by IP and new accounts, please report it to Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection. But this is not going to work because their edits are not vandalism and well-sourced. However, if you continue, you can be reported to WP:3RRNB or WP:ANI (community sanctions). My very best wishes (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Is Twitter now an RS to qualify as "well-sourced"?Axxxion (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

You removed CNN , but it does not really matter. My very best wishes (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)