This is an old revision of this page, as edited by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) at 19:14, 15 January 2016 (→WMF board members: wording). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:14, 15 January 2016 by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) (→WMF board members: wording)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This page is for the development of policies for the reform of Misplaced Pages. If you think that Misplaced Pages does not need reform then you have nothing to contribute here so please go away. This is a long-term project so do not expect instant results.
Subjects for discussion
- Bullying
- Bias
- Poor administration
- Democracy and consensus
- Fairness
- Other (suggestions welcome)
Who should we approach?
- Misplaced Pages administrators
- Trustees of the Wikimedia foundation
- Regulators (e.g. Ofcom)
- Other (suggestions welcome)
Possibly relevant sources
- http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520446/the-decline-of-wikipedia/
- https://posthegemony.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/meltdown-at-wikipedia/
- http://wikistrategies.net/james-heilman-removed/
WMF board members
The WMF must hire people to edit Misplaced Pages to police article content and resolve disputes. This can be done with a separate and new non-profit organization to avoid losing Section 230 immunity.
Page under construction