Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by No More Mr Nice Guy (talk | contribs) at 00:49, 13 March 2016 (→BDS: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Malik Shabazz/Tabs

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days

Islamic Terrorist Attacks

Regarding the attack in Yemen in which 15 Elderly Christians were killed, I do not think it is appropriate to take down the post and say that it is not an Islamic attack. The local authorities stated that there is a high possibility that ISIL is responsible for the attack. Just because you think that information should be censored because it involves attacks that have been committed by Muslims that doesn't mean that you can take them down. You're username is Malcolm X so I am sure that you have a biased opinion regarding Muslims.

JasperHansen111 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl X Saviour (talk • contribs) 08:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

It really doesn't matter what you or I think. What matters is what reliable sources say. According to the source you selected and cited, the motive for the attack is unknown and no group has claimed responsibility for it. If local authorities have identified the perpetrators, please cite a source that says so.

Also, please read WP:No personal attacks. As the policy says, "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Thank you. — MShabazz /_Stalk 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

• News and notes: Tretikov resigns, WMF in transition

• Featured content: This week's featured content

• Traffic report: Brawling

• Recent research: Misplaced Pages and paid labour; Swedish gender gap; how verifiable is "verifiable"?

• Blog: Wikimedia Foundation details requests to alter or remove content in new transparency report

You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View

You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Sylph Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.84.189 (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

As I wrote in my edit summary, modern historians generally disregard the "facts" in Henry's 1938 book about Reconstruction because of his glaring white supremacist and neo-Confederate bias. Feel free to believe its "facts" if you'd like, but don't use that book as a reliable source -- because it's not. — MShabazz /_Stalk 22:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

One of the facts documented by Robert Selph Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" is that Benjamin Wade attempted to have Colorado admitted as a state in an effort to get two more senators added to the pool of those likely to vote for conviction. You may choose to believe that merely because it is mentioned in Henry's book that it is not a fact, but that does not make you correct. It is an indisputable, historical fact and facts should be in the wikipedia whether you choose to believe them or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.84.189 (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

BDS

You have violated 1RR on the BDS article. Kindly self revert or I will have to report you. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 00:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)