User talk:CreativArticles5134

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CreativArticles5134 (talk | contribs) at 23:15, 27 March 2016 (Minor edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:15, 27 March 2016 by CreativArticles5134 (talk | contribs) (Minor edit)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please note spam, abusive or personal attacks will be removed. Especially by users who know better.

Speedy deletions coupled with spam, abuse or personal attacks are against Talk page guideline|https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines. New users learning to grasp the system should be treated fairly, not despicably.

Speedy deletion nomination of Danny Avila Electric Blues

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Danny Avila Electric Blues requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WWGB (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Danny Avila Electric Blues

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

March 2016

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that your username, "Jbcreativ", may not meet Misplaced Pages's username policy because it appears to be promotional. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Music1201 (talk) 06:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Danny Avila Electric Blues

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Danny Avila Electric Blues, requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

Speedy deletion nomination of Danny Avila Electric Blues

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Since this page has been deleted twice, I strongly suggest that you explain, at Talk:Danny Avila Electric Blues, how you think the subject is a significant or important musician. I don't see any assertion that comes close to meeting the criteria at WP:NMUSIC. I also don't see any citation of reliable secondary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LjL (talk) 21:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Admins, see this ANI discussion. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CreativArticles5134 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should not be blocked for stating my opinion and argument to contentions presented to me

Decline reason:

You were blocked for advertising or promotion, which is not permitted on Misplaced Pages. You were not blocked for stating your opinion. You have not addressed the reason for your block, therefore the unblock request is denied. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should really try addressing the reasons given in the block notice. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ian.thomson Yes of course. Certainly I respect you. As I stated, I understand why the article was deleted, but simply because I didn't agree isn't cause for it to get to this point. And as I said, the issue should have remained in my talk page. But I am new this. So this action is certainly aggressive. I and responding to you. So why block me? Because you don't like what I am saying. I hope not. I am only here to build encyclopedic knowledge. And respond to topics accordingly. But remember I am new. And it shows lot on your character to block instead of address. Discussion is respect. Show me where I deserve to be blocked legitimately? Certainly the article is no longer there.

CreativArticles5134 (talk) 23:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ian.thomson Also, we have to think about the spread of knowledge. There are far better avenues to “promote things.” I think about the people searching for information. That's what Misplaced Pages is for isn't?

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

CreativArticles5134 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No proof of advertising and promotion, user opinions respected

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No proof of advertising and promotion, user opinions respected |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No proof of advertising and promotion, user opinions respected |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No proof of advertising and promotion, user opinions respected |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@Ian.thomson Advertising and promotion are very specific things. None of that was done here. Nobody was told to buy anything. And no product was promoted. Correct?

Also, "originally promotional username, all edits have been to push a band, referred to themselves as "we"" this is taken out of context. I already explained the "we" referred to me and the person with the contention directly.

CreativArticles5134 (talk) 23:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock