Misplaced Pages

User talk:RegentsPark

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EdJohnston (talk | contribs) at 15:40, 5 April 2016 (→Events of 1971: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:40, 5 April 2016 by EdJohnston (talk | contribs) (→Events of 1971: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Question

So, edit-warring is allowed now, as long as you have consensus on your side? I just wanted to make sure, because recently I was told different. Thanks - WOLFchild 22:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Still reverting

here. Protection required, I think. Cassianto 22:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Done by Bencherlite. --regentspark (comment) 23:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Sun Warrior

I'll be adding 3 socks to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Buddhakahika/Archive tomorrow. This guy was the most prolific. Doug Weller talk 17:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Kanyakubja Brahmin

Kanyakubja Brahmin is one of several articles that are repeatedly disrupted by people who appear to be pushing the alleged Brahmin status of the Bhumihar. That status has been rejected time and again on Misplaced Pages. This anon is among those who return to reinstate the stuff. It becomes very tedious having to go round umpteen articles reverting them. - Sitush (talk) 21:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

NB: they can't actually fiddle with their primary target: the Bhumihar article itself is now under 30/500 restrictions, and numerous attempted pov forks have been salted. - Sitush (talk) 21:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

It's on my watch list. I don't really understand all this stuff but will protect the article if the IP returns. This obsession with caste ... ! --regentspark (comment) 14:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Anything to do with Bhumihars is a constant problem, although I suspect it is mostly one person who keep switching accounts. The IP did return to Kanyakubja and related articles today, and another named account has also been pushing the Bhumihar thing there. - Sitush (talk) 17:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
I sem-protected it. That should help. --regentspark (comment) 18:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
It should indeed. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Rahul Gandhi

Could you and other page watchers keep track of the criticism section being added to Rahul Gandhi? Surely the BLP policy exists to prevent statements like "he speaks lies and try to divert the attention" and such. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 21:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Added to watch list. --regentspark (comment) 00:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Events of 1971

The wording of your closure is apt. At some point the use of ARBIPA sanctions might be considered. I'm wondering if the next step could be topic bans from specific India-Pakistan conflicts for three months. That is less severe than a complete ban from all of ARBIPA. From a review of WP:DSLOG/2016, It looks like some 1RRs have been handed out, but people are not following them. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)